Retrospective Tools

Neatro vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Neatro logo

Neatro

5.5

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, AI grouping suggestions, an automatic ROTI survey, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.8

Retrospectives, health checks, estimations and standups in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme. An in-meeting AI assistant (trAI, still in beta) and a GA MCP server are included on every paid plan.

Full review →

Summary

Neatro scores 5.5 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.8 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members.

TeamRetro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.5
AI & Insights8.5
Integrations9.0
Open Platform10.0
Enterprise-grade8.5
DetailNeatroTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketAny
Free tierYesNo
Free limitFree forever for 1 team of up to 10 members (no guest links): unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all 30+ ready-to-use templates, 1 custom template, 40 of the 400+ Question Game icebreaker questions, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history — no exports, integrations or AI groupingNo free plan — 30-day trial, no credit card required
Starting price$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly), USD$20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium at $23.20; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly$50/mo billed annually ($60/mo billed monthly) — Small Organization plan, a 3-team bundle with unlimited members
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202017
HQQuebec, CanadaAustralia
Data residencyCanadaUnited States · European Union
Languages2 (English, French)27 (English, Arabic, Czech, …)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · JiraExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email · Image · Confluence · Notion
Features3370
Integrations515

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNeatroTeamRetro
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓✓
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode✓note✓
Whiteboard—✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling—✓
Icebreaker games—✓note
Agile Estimations—✓
Team Kudos—✓
AI grouping/clustering✓note✓
AI action items—✓
AI Summaries—✓
Team Insights—✓
In-meeting AI assistant—✓note
Action dashboard✓✓
Integrations
Asana✓note✓
Azure DevOps✓note✓
Basecamp—✓
ClickUp—✓
Confluence—✓
GitHub✓note✓
GitLab—✓
Jira✓note✓
Linear—✓
Microsoft Teams—✓
Monday.com✓note✓
Notion—✓
Shortcut—✓
Slack—✓
Trello—✓
Security & Privacy
SOC 2—✓note
GDPR—✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓
SCIM provisioning—✓note
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API—✓
Webhooks—✓
MCP server—✓

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + AI grouping suggestions at Step 2 that the facilitator accepts or rejects one at a time — assistive, not automatic
  • + Action Kanban board, an automatic ROTI survey and a prompt about last retro's open actions keep follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • − No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • − AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • − Free tier has <em>no exports, integrations, guest links or AI grouping</em> — all start at Premium
  • − Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), Quebec-only hosting, and no SCIM, audit logs, public API or cross-team rollups

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks and maturity models as a first-class module — custom dimensions, radar charts, trends across sprints
  • + Retrospectives, health checks and planning-poker estimation on one subscription
  • + SAML SSO, RBAC and US-or-EU hosting on <em>every</em> plan, not just Enterprise
  • + GA MCP server, team-level API keys and HMAC-signed webhooks on all plans; 15 native agile-stack integrations plus Zapier and n8n
  • + <em>trAI</em> in-meeting assistant (beta) on trial and paid plans, plus 18 in-meeting icebreaker games on every account

TeamRetro — cons

  • − No free tier — 30-day trial, then a paid plan
  • − The SOC 2 Type 2 report is Enterprise-only; lower tiers get the SOC 3 report instead
  • − SCIM, IP allowlisting, domain capture and guest/observer roles are Enterprise-only, and audit logs are on request rather than self-serve
  • − Cross-team insights, reports and programs (team-of-teams) require Enterprise
  • − ISO 27001 is inherited from AWS, and hosting is US or EU only — no APAC region despite the Australian HQ

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.