Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.7

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.4

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.7 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 6.4 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use and fun factor. Reetro leads on value, AI & insights and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor5.5
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailEasyRetroReetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no team3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price$25/mo$39/team/mo ($32/team/mo annual); flat $49/mo org-wide on Pro Unlimited
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162019
HQBrazilCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residency
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)English only
Features2441
Integrations57

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroReetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUpnote
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnotenote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Business tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Per-team Pro pricing rose to $39/team/mo ($32 annual); the cheapest path for scale is the flat Pro Unlimited
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons