Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Parabol

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.7

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
Parabol logo

Parabol

7.6

Open-source agile meetings for retros, poker, standups and check-ins

Parabol is an <strong>open-source agile meeting platform</strong> spanning retrospectives, sprint poker, async standups, team check-ins and lightweight team health, with deep backlog sync to Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Linear and AI-assisted grouping, summaries, icebreakers and discussion prompts.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.7 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Parabol scores 7.6 overall and is best for distributed agile teams that want one open-source tool for retros, poker, standups and lightweight team health. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use and value. Parabol leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Parabol edges ahead with an overall score of 7.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
Parabol
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights7.5
Integrations9.0
Enterprise-grade7.0
DetailEasyRetroParabol
CategoryRetrospectivesAll-in-One Agile
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no teamUnlimited users, 2 teams, 10 meetings/month, 30-day history, 2 custom templates
Starting price$25/mo$8/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members)$192/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162015
HQBrazilRemote
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Self-hosted
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)English only
Features2443
Integrations57

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroParabol
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnotenote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

Parabol — pros

  • + Open source (AGPL-3.0) with self-host and on-prem options
  • + 40+ retro templates plus poker, standups, check-ins and team health in one tool
  • + Strong backlog write-back to Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Linear
  • + AI summaries, suggested groupings and discussion prompts that surface real themes
  • + Anonymous reflections and lightweight team health check built in

Parabol — cons

  • Free tier capped at 10 meetings/month and 30-day history
  • No native whiteboard, presentation mode or screen-share mode
  • Health-check is a single emoji poll — no custom radars or trend dashboards
  • SSO, SCIM, audit-grade controls and uptime SLA gated to Enterprise
  • No Confluence, Trello or multi-language support
← All comparisons