Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Kollabe

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.3

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, drawing-on-cards (August 2025), and 2026 updates including hide-column controls and on-the-fly timer controls (pause/resume, +1 minute).

Full review →
Kollabe logo

Kollabe

5.6

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and has extended into retrospectives and standups — the estimation side remains the centre of gravity, with retros and standups added as adjacent rituals rather than the headline product. It bundles icebreakers, anonymous input, AI summaries and action-item sync-back to Jira, GitHub and Azure DevOps in a flat per-space workspace, and retro history exports in bulk to CSV or JSON. Recent additions include a Slack-based async standup flow, a public API and MCP server, and cross-ritual weekly reporting. Some retro mechanics the marketing asserts are not corroborated outside the vendor's own pages — verify the board before committing.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe scores 5.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and enterprise-grade. Kollabe leads on AI & insights, integrations and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.5
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailEasyRetroKollabe
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit2 public boards/month (max 2 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, unlimited participants10 members per room, limited meetings/month, 7-day history, no data export
Starting price$25/mo$29/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$87/mo (3 team spaces × $29 Premium; each space allows unlimited members)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162023
HQBrazilSydney, Australia
Data residency
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraConfluence · CSV · JSON
Features2529
Integrations56

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroKollabe
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linearnote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size
  • + Still actively maintained — hide-column and on-the-fly timer controls shipped in 2026, and the web app was rebuilt from AngularJS onto Vue mid-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); data sits in US Central with no EU residency option, SAML SSO starts at the $90/mo tier, and there's no SCIM
  • Free plan allows 2 public boards per month, keeps only 2 boards on the dashboard (archived ones included), and excludes teams and team boards entirely

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants; ease of use rates ~5.0/5 across 31 verified third-party reviews
  • + Retro action items become real Jira and GitHub tickets — confirmed in independent user reviews, not just vendor copy
  • + Bulk export of retro history to CSV or JSON, plus one-click Confluence pages; public API and MCP server on Premium

Kollabe — cons

  • Slack integration is standup-only (no retro summaries or actions to a channel); no Microsoft Teams
  • Solo-founder operation with no SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published GDPR posture; SSO/SAML and SLA sit behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal pulse — no way to track team trends across sprints
  • Several vendor-listed retro mechanics (independent dot voting, drag-to-group, AI grouping) are absent from the changelog and could not be corroborated
  • Free tier caps meetings/month with 7-day history and no data export; carrying actions between retros is paid-only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.