Retrospective Tools

ScatterSpoke vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

6.6

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI-powered feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and team feedback into themes, sentiment metrics and prioritised action items for engineering leaders.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

ScatterSpoke scores 6.6 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI to surface themes and impact across many retros. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

ScatterSpoke leads on AI & insights. TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights8.5
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailScatterSpokeTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketAny
Free tierYesNo
Free limit1 team, 10 users, unlimited retros, 20 AI reports/month, 90-day history30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$50/mo$25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$50/mo$50/mo billed annually
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20142017
HQUSAAustralia
Data residencyUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features2963
Integrations315

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityScatterSpokeTeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnotenote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + AI themes, sentiment scoring and impact analysis across retros
  • + 20+ retro formats plus custom formats with real-time collaboration
  • + Cross-team goals, metrics and executive-style rollups
  • + Action items sync to Jira; standups and async feedback included

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • Integration coverage is narrow (Jira, Slack, Teams only)
  • No native health checks, team radars or mood tracking
  • Tier-based pricing jumps sharply ($0 to $50 to $500/mo)
  • SAML/OIDC SSO and SCIM are Enterprise tier only; Business gets social logins + MFA

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons