Retrospective Tools

Spreo vs Neatro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Spreo logo

Spreo

5.3

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Both the Jira integration and SSO require the $6/user Business plan, and AI stops at beta sticky-note clustering.

Full review →
Neatro logo

Neatro

5.4

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →

Summary

Spreo scores 5.3 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop — budget for the Business plan, which is where Jira and SSO actually live. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly).

Neatro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

Spreo leads on fun factor and open platform. Neatro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and integrations.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Neatro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailSpreoNeatro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierNoYes
Free limit30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expiresFree forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all ready-to-use templates, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history
Starting price$4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly)$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$144/mo billed annually (Business — 24 x $6; Starter's $96/mo covers only one shared team space)$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202020
HQUKQuebec, Canada
Data residencyEuropean UnionCanada
LanguagesEnglish only2 (English, French)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraPDF · CSV · Jira
Features4029
Integrations15

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilitySpreoNeatro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.comnote
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Deep gadget shelf that actually serves the session: shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats
  • + Fully configurable voting rounds — votes per person, duplicate votes, and voting on topics as well as individual stickies
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, story points and issue creation in-board
  • + @mentions and a notification centre across stickies, cards, text blocks and comments
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Spreo)

Spreo — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • <strong>Jira and SSO both start at the $6/user Business plan</strong>, so the $4 Starter headline is misleading past a single team space
  • AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials pause to read-only
  • Desktop and laptop only — the vendor states Spreo runs on <em>"all desktop and laptop devices"</em>, with no mobile or tablet support
  • Two renames in under a year leave the review trail split across three names — G2 files it under <em>Ludi</em>, Capterra and Product Hunt under <em>Metro Retro</em>

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action Kanban board plus an automatic reminder of last retro's open actions keeps follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), no GDPR statement, and hosting is Quebec-only
  • No cross-team rollups, org health dashboard, SCIM, audit logs, public API or webhooks

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.