Retrospective Tools

Miro vs Neatro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Miro logo

Miro

7.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with a 7,000+ template library (300+ retro formats among them), AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Engage live polls and word clouds, real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams. Flows and Sidekicks ship as AI Workflows, a paid Enterprise product.

Full review →
Neatro logo

Neatro

5.4

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →

Summary

Miro scores 7.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Neatro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

Miro leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Neatro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Miro
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform6.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailMiroNeatro
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeEnterpriseMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 editable boards, ~10 AI credits/mo, 100 MCP calls/day, full template library, 250+ app marketplace; no private boards, SSO, guests or two-way integrationsFree forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all ready-to-use templates, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history
Starting price$8/user/mo$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$192/mo billed annually (Starter, 24 seats)$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20112020
HQAmsterdam, NLQuebec, Canada
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · AustraliaCanada
Languages8 (English, Spanish, German, …)2 (English, French)
Export formatsImage · PDF · CSVPDF · CSV · Jira
Features3929
Integrations115

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMiroNeatro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananotenote
Azure DevOpsnotenote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnotenote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teams
Monday.comnote
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Miro — pros

  • + Enormous template library (7,000+ board templates, 300+ retro formats) plus the Miroverse community gallery
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by colour, tag, author, keyword and sentiment — real time saved on a 60-sticky board
  • + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way card sync
  • + <strong>Engage</strong> activities — live polls, word clouds, scales, ranking — are bundled with Business; participants join by QR code with no Miro account
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and US/EU/AU data residency

Miro — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: 24 people cost $192/mo on Starter (annual). The tier that actually matters for retros — Business, with two-way Jira sync, SSO and Engage — is $480/mo
  • No health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team pulse; Engage Scales reads the room once, it doesn't draw a trend line
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • SCIM, audit logs, domain control and data residency are Enterprise-only (30-seat minimum)
  • No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard; actions only persist as Jira/Azure DevOps cards

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action Kanban board plus an automatic reminder of last retro's open actions keeps follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), no GDPR statement, and hosting is Quebec-only
  • No cross-team rollups, org health dashboard, SCIM, audit logs, public API or webhooks

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.