Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Neatro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

5.6

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and has extended into retrospectives and standups — the estimation side remains the centre of gravity, with retros and standups added as adjacent rituals rather than the headline product. It bundles icebreakers, anonymous input, AI summaries and action-item sync-back to Jira, GitHub and Azure DevOps in a flat per-space workspace, and retro history exports in bulk to CSV or JSON. Recent additions include a Slack-based async standup flow, a public API and MCP server, and cross-ritual weekly reporting. Some retro mechanics the marketing asserts are not corroborated outside the vendor's own pages — verify the board before committing.

Full review →
Neatro logo

Neatro

5.4

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 5.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

Neatro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe leads on AI & insights, integrations and open platform. Neatro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.5
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailKollabeNeatro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit10 members per room, limited meetings/month, 7-day history, no data exportFree forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all ready-to-use templates, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history
Starting price$29/mo$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (3 team spaces × $29 Premium; each space allows unlimited members)$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20232020
HQSydney, AustraliaQuebec, Canada
Data residencyCanada
LanguagesEnglish only2 (English, French)
Export formatsConfluence · CSV · JSONPDF · CSV · Jira
Features2929
Integrations65

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityKollabeNeatro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teams
Monday.comnote
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants; ease of use rates ~5.0/5 across 31 verified third-party reviews
  • + Retro action items become real Jira and GitHub tickets — confirmed in independent user reviews, not just vendor copy
  • + Bulk export of retro history to CSV or JSON, plus one-click Confluence pages; public API and MCP server on Premium

Kollabe — cons

  • Slack integration is standup-only (no retro summaries or actions to a channel); no Microsoft Teams
  • Solo-founder operation with no SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published GDPR posture; SSO/SAML and SLA sit behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal pulse — no way to track team trends across sprints
  • Several vendor-listed retro mechanics (independent dot voting, drag-to-group, AI grouping) are absent from the changelog and could not be corroborated
  • Free tier caps meetings/month with 7-day history and no data export; carrying actions between retros is paid-only

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action Kanban board plus an automatic reminder of last retro's open actions keeps follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), no GDPR statement, and hosting is Quebec-only
  • No cross-team rollups, org health dashboard, SCIM, audit logs, public API or webhooks

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.