Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

7.3

Figma's whiteboard with AI sticky clustering, an official MCP server that reaches FigJam boards, and a $3 Collab seat — free tier caps at 3 boards

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, timer, music, stamps and emotes, voting sessions, one-click AI that sorts and summarises stickies, and 300+ ready-made templates including community retro boards. Design and product teams already living in Figma get retros without buying a second tool, backed by Figma's SAML/SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India, Brazil and Japan. Figma's official MCP server reads FigJam boards on every plan; letting an agent write to them is a beta that needs a Full seat. Voting sessions, open guest sessions, audio chat and webhooks all require a paid team; publishing custom templates requires Organization.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.1

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a genuinely free tier and a shipped app that runs well ahead of its own marketing site. Three board types — standard, phased (Reflect/Group/Vote/Discuss) and RoundUp, an async video, voice or text interview with AI-generated questions — sit alongside health checks, polls, a happiness calendar and an action tracker. AI meeting summaries, sentiment and emotion trends, auto-grouping and AI action items are quota-limited rather than paid-only, so Free gets a taste. SSO, the Scheduler and anonymous retros start on the $10/team Pro plan; data retention needs Pro Unlimited, billed at $49/month per organisation. ISO 27001 is claimed at vendor level; SOC 2 is listed as compliant, not certified.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 7.3 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement, AI sticky clustering and an agent-accessible canvas. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 6.1 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a cheap, AI-assisted retro board — SSO, health checks, the Scheduler and anonymous retros at $10/team/mo, or $49/mo flat for the whole org — and who don't need an API or ClickUp/GitHub/Linear. It offers a free tier.

FigJam leads on fun factor, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Reetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and AI & insights.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations7.0
Open Platform9.5
Enterprise-grade9.0
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights7.5
Integrations4.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailFigJamReetro
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam files per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day up to 500/month, 300+ templates, timer, music, AI Sort/Summarize/Generate, REST API and 20 MCP tool calls/month, 30-day version history — no voting sessions, audio chat, open (no-account) sessions or webhooks3 teams, 9 members and 10 active boards per team, 6 columns, 50 guests plus unlimited read-only users, 1 health check/month, and limited AI (1 meeting summary, 3 auto-groupings, 3 AI action items per month)
Starting price$3/user/mo (Collab seat, billed annually; $5 billed monthly)$10/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, billed annually; $120/mo billed monthly at $5)Free (within free tier); $30/mo if all three teams need Pro
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20122019
HQSan Francisco, USCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia · IN · BR · JP—
Languages7 (English, Japanese, Korean, …)English only
Export formatsPDF · Image · CSVCSV · Word · Excel · PDF · Email · Jira
Features4250
Integrations102

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamReetro
Features
Custom templates✓note✓
Anonymous input—✓note
Health Checks—✓
Action tracking—✓
Async mode✓✓
Whiteboard✓✓note
Independent voting✓note✓note
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games✓note—
Agile Estimations✓note—
Team Kudos—✓
AI grouping/clustering✓✓note
AI action items✓note✓note
AI Summaries✓✓note
Team Insights—✓
In-meeting AI assistant✓note—
Action dashboard—✓
Integrations
Asana✓note—
Azure DevOps—✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓note—
GitHub✓note—
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear✓note—
Microsoft Teams✓note—
Monday.com✓note—
Notion✓note—
Shortcut——
Slack✓note—
Trello✓note—
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓—
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note—
ISO 27001✓✓note
On-premises——
Public API✓—
Webhooks✓—
MCP server✓—

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat (billed annually; $5 monthly) unlocks unlimited boards and full FigJam editing without a Full Figma seat
  • + Free Starter tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month), 300+ templates, the timer, music and AI Sort/Summarize
  • + Playful, engaging UX — stamps, emotes, high-fives, music, cursor chat — lifts retro fun factor
  • + Best open platform of any whiteboard here: REST API on every plan, webhooks on paid, and an <strong>official MCP server that reads FigJam boards</strong> on every plan
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, activity logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India, Brazil and Japan

FigJam — cons

  • − No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • − Anonymity is weak — votes reveal who voted once the session ends, and live cursors show who is writing even when a sticky's name tag is switched off
  • − Action items leave the board only by hand: the Jira, GitHub and Asana widgets turn selected stickies into tickets, but Confluence, Linear and Notion are embeds only and there is no Azure DevOps
  • − Free Starter caps a team at 3 FigJam files and excludes voting, audio chat, no-account guest links and webhooks; publishing custom templates needs Organization
  • − Built primarily for designers — the canvas paradigm is fiddly for structured retros, and large boards get sluggish

Reetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free tier, no credit card — 3 teams, 9 members, 6 columns and 50 guests, plus quota-limited AI (1 meeting summary, 3 auto-groupings, 3 AI action items a month)
  • + <strong>SSO, the Scheduler and anonymous retros all start on the $10/team Pro plan</strong>, confirmed by the app's own upgrade copy
  • + Pro Unlimited is genuinely org-wide — the app bills it at <em>$49/month per organisation</em>, not per team
  • + RoundUp collects async video, voice or text feedback with AI-generated, editable interview questions — a real async mode, not just a board left open
  • + AI meeting summaries carry sentiment, emotion trends (joy/trust/fear/sadness) and participation metrics, and roll up into cross-team comparison views

Reetro — cons

  • − The marketing site understates the product: PDF and XLSX export, @mentions, link cards and comparative reporting are all live in the app yet tagged <em>coming soon</em> on the pricing page
  • − No public API, no webhooks and no MCP server — nothing can drive Reetro programmatically
  • − Slack and Teams notifications are sold, but the shipped app has no way to connect either; Confluence and Trello are export-only, a Word or CSV file plus a link to the other vendor's import instructions
  • − No playable icebreakers: the in-app 'Icebreakers &amp; Games' tiles link to four game subdomains, none of which resolves any more
  • − No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (the trust portal lists SOC 2 as 'compliant', ISO 27001 as 'certified'), and no SCIM
  • − Anonymity is paid-only, and the Pro Unlimited plan card still reads PER TEAM while the FAQ and the app both say per organisation

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.