Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Neatro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

6.2

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool built around a fast drag-and-drop board and a 300-plus template library. 2026 added working AI — card grouping, meeting summaries with a sentiment gauge and board-column generation from a theme prompt — plus richer surveys with team templates and trend charts, an open-action-items panel on team boards, free PNG/CSV export and organisation audit logs.

Full review →
Neatro logo

Neatro

5.5

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, AI grouping suggestions, an automatic ROTI survey, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 6.2 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Neatro scores 5.5 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on AI & insights and open platform. Neatro leads on retro toolkit and fun factor.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform4.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailEasyRetroNeatro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 public board/month (max 1 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, no AI features; unlimited participants and free PNG/CSV exportFree forever for 1 team of up to 10 members (no guest links): unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all 30+ ready-to-use templates, 1 custom template, 40 of the 400+ Question Game icebreaker questions, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history — no exports, integrations or AI grouping
Starting price$25/mo$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly), USD
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium at $23.20; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162020
HQBrazilQuebec, Canada
Data residencyUnited StatesCanada
Languages8 (English, Portuguese, Dutch, …)2 (English, French)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraPDF · CSV · Jira
Features4033
Integrations55

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroNeatro
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓note✓
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode—✓note
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓—
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓✓note
AI action items——
AI Summaries✓—
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓✓
Integrations
Asana—✓note
Azure DevOps—✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓—
GitHub—✓note
GitLab——
Jira✓✓note
Linear——
Microsoft Teams✓note—
Monday.com—✓note
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack✓note—
Trello✓—
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR✓—
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API✓note—
Webhooks——
MCP server——

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Fastest setup of any tool we run: pick a template, share a link, participants join with no account
  • + AI now does real work on the board — card grouping with reviewable merge suggestions, a meeting summary with an AI-estimated sentiment gauge, and board columns generated from a theme prompt
  • + Surveys became a light pulse-check loop in 2026: numeric-scale and multiple-choice polls, team survey templates that auto-attach to every new board, and trend charts on the Analytics page
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size — and PNG/CSV export went free in July 2026
  • + Plainly still shipping: nine changelog entries in 2026, including an open-action-items panel that carries unfinished actions into the team's next board

EasyRetro — cons

  • − Health checking is survey-shaped — a trend chart per survey, but no multi-dimension health model, radar or org-wide health view
  • − Integrations are export-shaped: Jira, Confluence and Trello take cards out, Slack only announces new boards, and there's no GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps or calendar
  • − The API is one paid-only create-board endpoint; there are no webhooks, no read or export API and no MCP server
  • − Vendor holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 (it leans on Google Cloud's), data sits in US Central with no EU option, SAML SSO starts at $90/mo, audit logs at $150/mo, and SCIM doesn't exist
  • − Free plan is now 1 public board per month and 1 board total on the dashboard (archived included), with AI features excluded

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + AI grouping suggestions at Step 2 that the facilitator accepts or rejects one at a time — assistive, not automatic
  • + Action Kanban board, an automatic ROTI survey and a prompt about last retro's open actions keep follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • − No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • − AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • − Free tier has <em>no exports, integrations, guest links or AI grouping</em> — all start at Premium
  • − Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), Quebec-only hosting, and no SCIM, audit logs, public API or cross-team rollups

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.