Retrospective Tools

Neatro vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Neatro logo

Neatro

5.5

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, AI grouping suggestions, an automatic ROTI survey, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

4.9

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool built around a guided five-phase facilitation flow, anonymous brainstorming, dot voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks. Since August 2026 the vendor has also run Retrium Next, a separate free open beta that rebuilds the retro around an AI co-facilitator.

Full review →

Summary

Neatro scores 5.5 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

Retrium scores 4.9 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

Neatro leads on ease of use, value, fun factor, integrations and open platform. Retrium leads on AI & insights and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Neatro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.5. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights2.5
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailNeatroRetrium
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketMid-market
Free tierYesNo
Free limitFree forever for 1 team of up to 10 members (no guest links): unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all 30+ ready-to-use templates, 1 custom template, 40 of the 400+ Question Game icebreaker questions, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history — no exports, integrations or AI groupingNo free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team Radar
Starting price$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly), USD$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium at $23.20; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202014
HQQuebec, CanadaWashington, D.C., USA
Data residencyCanada—
Languages2 (English, French)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · JiraCSV · Jira
Features3333
Integrations52

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNeatroRetrium
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓✓
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode✓note✓note
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓✓
Polling——
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓note✓note
AI action items—✓note
AI Summaries——
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓✓note
Integrations
Asana✓note—
Azure DevOps✓note—
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub✓note—
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com✓note—
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack—✓note
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2—✓
GDPR—✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning—✓note
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API——
Webhooks——
MCP server——

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + AI grouping suggestions at Step 2 that the facilitator accepts or rejects one at a time — assistive, not automatic
  • + Action Kanban board, an automatic ROTI survey and a prompt about last retro's open actions keep follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • − No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • − AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • − Free tier has <em>no exports, integrations, guest links or AI grouping</em> — all start at Premium
  • − Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), Quebec-only hosting, and no SCIM, audit logs, public API or cross-team rollups

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow — think, group, vote, discuss, wrap-up
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design, with a documented Fishbone root-cause format
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — ten prebuilt radars plus a custom-spoke template, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing at <strong>$39/mo</strong> with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • − No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique and SSO are excluded from it
  • − Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • − AI exists only in <strong>Retrium Next</strong>, a separate free open beta with no data migration, no uptime commitment and no pricing yet — the product you actually pay for has none
  • − The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV, TXT and send-to-Jira
  • − The shipping product has published no release notes since <strong>August 2024</strong>, and the Continuous Improvement Journey beta closed in December 2023

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.