Retrospective Tools

Neatro vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Neatro logo

Neatro

5.6

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with anonymous brainstorming, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

5.1

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →

Summary

Neatro scores 5.6 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

Retrium scores 5.1 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

Neatro leads on ease of use, value, fun factor and integrations. Retrium leads on enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Neatro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor5.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value6.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailNeatroRetrium
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketMid-market
Free tierYesNo
Free limitFree forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives, 70+ templates, 30-day data history30-day free trial (column techniques and Team Radar), no credit card required
Starting price$23.20/team/mo (annual)$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium)$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202014
HQQuebec, CanadaWashington, D.C., USA
Data residencyCanada
Languages2 (English, French)English only
Features2523
Integrations52

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNeatroRetrium
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework that reliably produces psychological safety
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action carryover and a Kanban tracker keep follow-through visible between sessions
  • + Generous free tier (up to 10 members, 70+ templates) and active blog/facilitation content

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration for notifications or reminders
  • No AI features at all — no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action-item extraction
  • Per-team pricing model gets awkward as the org scales beyond a handful of squads
  • Not independently SOC 2, ISO 27001 or GDPR certified — relies on Azure's underlying certifications
  • No cross-team rollups, org-level dashboard, SCIM, or audit logs

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar covers psychological safety and custom health checks
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free tier; 30-day trial only
  • Integrations are thin beyond Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or insights
  • No native Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence integration
  • Public shipping cadence has slowed — no 2025 changelog or product blog activity visible
  • Retro-only scope; no planning poker, kudos, icebreakers or whiteboard
← All comparisons