Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

6.9

Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

5.1

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 6.9 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

Retrium scores 5.1 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

FigJam leads on value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. Retrium leads on ease of use and retro toolkit.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations6.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value6.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailFigJamRetrium
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketMid-market
Free tierYesNo
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam boards per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templates30-day free trial (column techniques and Team Radar), no credit card required
Starting price$3/user/mo (Collab seat)$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20122014
HQSan Francisco, USWashington, D.C., USA
Data residencyUnited States
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features3823
Integrations82

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamRetrium
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.comnote
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnotenote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
  • + Free tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) and the full retro toolkit
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
  • No Microsoft Teams or Azure DevOps integration
  • Free Starter caps teams at 3 FigJam boards — a recurring retro practice outgrows it fast
  • Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar covers psychological safety and custom health checks
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free tier; 30-day trial only
  • Integrations are thin beyond Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or insights
  • No native Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence integration
  • Public shipping cadence has slowed — no 2025 changelog or product blog activity visible
  • Retro-only scope; no planning poker, kudos, icebreakers or whiteboard
← All comparisons