Retrospective Tools

Retrium vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retrium logo

Retrium

5.1

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Retrium scores 5.1 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value6.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailRetriumTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketAny
Free tierNoNo
Free limit30-day free trial (column techniques and Team Radar), no credit card required30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$39/mo$25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$117/mo$50/mo billed annually
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20142017
HQWashington, D.C., USAAustralia
Data residencyUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features2363
Integrations215

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetriumTeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnotenote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar covers psychological safety and custom health checks
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free tier; 30-day trial only
  • Integrations are thin beyond Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or insights
  • No native Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence integration
  • Public shipping cadence has slowed — no 2025 changelog or product blog activity visible
  • Retro-only scope; no planning poker, kudos, icebreakers or whiteboard

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons