Retrospective Tools

Neatro vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Neatro logo

Neatro

5.5

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, AI grouping suggestions, an automatic ROTI survey, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.1

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a genuinely free tier and a shipped app that runs well ahead of its own marketing site. Three board types — standard, phased (Reflect/Group/Vote/Discuss) and RoundUp, an async video, voice or text interview with AI-generated questions — sit alongside health checks, polls, a happiness calendar and an action tracker. AI meeting summaries, sentiment and emotion trends, auto-grouping and AI action items are quota-limited rather than paid-only, so Free gets a taste. SSO, the Scheduler and anonymous retros start on the $10/team Pro plan; data retention needs Pro Unlimited, billed at $49/month per organisation. ISO 27001 is claimed at vendor level; SOC 2 is listed as compliant, not certified.

Full review →

Summary

Neatro scores 5.5 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 6.1 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a cheap, AI-assisted retro board — SSO, health checks, the Scheduler and anonymous retros at $10/team/mo, or $49/mo flat for the whole org — and who don't need an API or ClickUp/GitHub/Linear. It offers a free tier.

Neatro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor and integrations. Reetro leads on value, AI & insights, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights7.5
Integrations4.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailNeatroReetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFree forever for 1 team of up to 10 members (no guest links): unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all 30+ ready-to-use templates, 1 custom template, 40 of the 400+ Question Game icebreaker questions, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history — no exports, integrations or AI grouping3 teams, 9 members and 10 active boards per team, 6 columns, 50 guests plus unlimited read-only users, 1 health check/month, and limited AI (1 meeting summary, 3 auto-groupings, 3 AI action items per month)
Starting price$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly), USD$10/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium at $23.20; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthlyFree (within free tier); $30/mo if all three teams need Pro
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202019
HQQuebec, CanadaCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residencyCanada—
Languages2 (English, French)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · JiraCSV · Word · Excel · PDF · Email · Jira
Features3350
Integrations52

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNeatroReetro
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓note
Health Checks✓✓
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode✓note✓
Whiteboard—✓note
Independent voting✓✓note
Polling—✓note
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos—✓
AI grouping/clustering✓note✓note
AI action items—✓note
AI Summaries—✓note
Team Insights—✓
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓✓
Integrations
Asana✓note—
Azure DevOps✓note✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub✓note—
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com✓note—
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack——
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR—✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001—✓note
On-premises——
Public API——
Webhooks——
MCP server——

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + AI grouping suggestions at Step 2 that the facilitator accepts or rejects one at a time — assistive, not automatic
  • + Action Kanban board, an automatic ROTI survey and a prompt about last retro's open actions keep follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • − No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • − AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • − Free tier has <em>no exports, integrations, guest links or AI grouping</em> — all start at Premium
  • − Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), Quebec-only hosting, and no SCIM, audit logs, public API or cross-team rollups

Reetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free tier, no credit card — 3 teams, 9 members, 6 columns and 50 guests, plus quota-limited AI (1 meeting summary, 3 auto-groupings, 3 AI action items a month)
  • + <strong>SSO, the Scheduler and anonymous retros all start on the $10/team Pro plan</strong>, confirmed by the app's own upgrade copy
  • + Pro Unlimited is genuinely org-wide — the app bills it at <em>$49/month per organisation</em>, not per team
  • + RoundUp collects async video, voice or text feedback with AI-generated, editable interview questions — a real async mode, not just a board left open
  • + AI meeting summaries carry sentiment, emotion trends (joy/trust/fear/sadness) and participation metrics, and roll up into cross-team comparison views

Reetro — cons

  • − The marketing site understates the product: PDF and XLSX export, @mentions, link cards and comparative reporting are all live in the app yet tagged <em>coming soon</em> on the pricing page
  • − No public API, no webhooks and no MCP server — nothing can drive Reetro programmatically
  • − Slack and Teams notifications are sold, but the shipped app has no way to connect either; Confluence and Trello are export-only, a Word or CSV file plus a link to the other vendor's import instructions
  • − No playable icebreakers: the in-app 'Icebreakers &amp; Games' tiles link to four game subdomains, none of which resolves any more
  • − No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (the trust portal lists SOC 2 as 'compliant', ISO 27001 as 'certified'), and no SCIM
  • − Anonymity is paid-only, and the Pro Unlimited plan card still reads PER TEAM while the FAQ and the app both say per organisation

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.