Retrospective Tools

Estimioo vs Kollabe

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Estimioo logo

Estimioo

4.6

AI-powered planning poker, retrospectives and standups for agile teams

Estimioo is a lightweight, browser-based agile-ceremony tool that bundles AI-assisted planning poker, a 41-template sprint retrospective board and async daily standups into one shared workspace. The centre of gravity is still estimation, but the retro module is now a real one: one-click templates, a 2–25 minute session timer, per-card thumbs-up voting, synced icebreakers, ambient audio, and a Claude-powered summary that returns team mood, key themes and ranked action items. What it is not is a facilitation suite — retro cards are attributed rather than anonymous, and there is no grouping, no dot-vote budget and no action-item owners or carry-over between sprints.

Full review →
Kollabe logo

Kollabe

5.6

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and has extended into retrospectives and standups — the estimation side remains the centre of gravity, with retros and standups added as adjacent rituals rather than the headline product. It bundles icebreakers, anonymous input, AI summaries and action-item sync-back to Jira, GitHub and Azure DevOps in a flat per-space workspace, and retro history exports in bulk to CSV or JSON. Recent additions include a Slack-based async standup flow, a public API and MCP server, and cross-ritual weekly reporting. Some retro mechanics the marketing asserts are not corroborated outside the vendor's own pages — verify the board before committing.

Full review →

Summary

Estimioo scores 4.6 overall and is best for small, distributed agile teams who want fast AI-assisted planning poker and async standups at near-zero cost, plus a genuinely usable 41-template retro board — and who don't need anonymity, grouping, or action-item follow-through across sprints. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe scores 5.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

Estimioo leads on value and AI & insights. Kollabe leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, integrations and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Estimioo
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights4.5
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.5
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailEstimiooKollabe
CategoryAll-in-One AgileRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitUp to 10 participants, 5 sessions/month, 5 AI estimates/month, 1 AI retro summary per retro, 1-hour session expiry, CSV export10 members per room, limited meetings/month, 7-day history, no data export
Starting price$7/workspace/mo$29/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$7/mo (Team plan is flat per-workspace with unlimited participants, not per-seat; separate projects per team need the quote-only Enterprise tier)$87/mo (3 team spaces × $29 Premium; each space allows unlimited members)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2023
HQSydney, Australia
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · JSONConfluence · CSV · JSON
Features2329
Integrations46

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEstimiooKollabe
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action trackingnote
Team Insightsnotenote
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent votingnote
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnotenote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Estimioo — pros

  • + Genuinely cheap — flat <strong>$7/workspace/mo</strong> with unlimited participants, plus a usable free tier
  • + 41 one-click retro templates, a 2–25 minute session timer and per-card upvoting — all verified in a live board
  • + Unusually fun for the price: 340+ synced icebreakers, six ambient soundscapes and 16 live emoji reactions
  • + One-click Claude retro summary returns team mood, key themes and ranked action items with <em>Add all to board</em>
  • + Jira connects by OAuth or API token with JQL backlog import; guests join by link or QR with no signup

Estimioo — cons

  • Retro cards are <strong>attributed</strong> — author name and avatar on every note, with no anonymity option anywhere in the product
  • No grouping or clustering, no dot-vote budget, no action-item owners or due dates, and no carry-over between retros
  • Slack and Teams are clipboard-copy buttons rather than integrations; Jira write-back is still on the roadmap, and there's no API, webhooks or MCP
  • No SOC 2, ISO 27001, DPA or data-residency option, and the privacy policy was last updated April 2025 — the quote-only Enterprise tier's SSO claim is unverified
  • No independent coverage (no G2, Capterra or Product Hunt listing), and the site's own social proof contradicts itself — <em>450+ teams</em>, <em>183 agile teams</em> and <em>3000+ teams</em> all appear

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants; ease of use rates ~5.0/5 across 31 verified third-party reviews
  • + Retro action items become real Jira and GitHub tickets — confirmed in independent user reviews, not just vendor copy
  • + Bulk export of retro history to CSV or JSON, plus one-click Confluence pages; public API and MCP server on Premium

Kollabe — cons

  • Slack integration is standup-only (no retro summaries or actions to a channel); no Microsoft Teams
  • Solo-founder operation with no SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published GDPR posture; SSO/SAML and SLA sit behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal pulse — no way to track team trends across sprints
  • Several vendor-listed retro mechanics (independent dot voting, drag-to-group, AI grouping) are absent from the changelog and could not be corroborated
  • Free tier caps meetings/month with 7-day history and no data export; carrying actions between retros is paid-only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.