Estimioo
4.6AI-powered planning poker, retrospectives and standups for agile teams
Estimioo is a lightweight, browser-based agile-ceremony tool that bundles AI-assisted planning poker, a 41-template sprint retrospective board and async daily standups into one shared workspace. The centre of gravity is still estimation, but the retro module is now a real one: one-click templates, a 2–25 minute session timer, per-card thumbs-up voting, synced icebreakers, ambient audio, and a Claude-powered summary that returns team mood, key themes and ranked action items. What it is not is a facilitation suite — retro cards are attributed rather than anonymous, and there is no grouping, no dot-vote budget and no action-item owners or carry-over between sprints.
Full review →
FigJam
7.2Figma's whiteboard with AI sticky clustering, voting sessions and a $3 Collab seat — free tier caps at 3 boards
FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, timer, music, expressive cursor stamps, voting sessions, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises stickies, and 300+ ready-made templates including community retro boards. Design and product teams already living in Figma get retros without buying a second tool, backed by Figma's SAML/SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and EU data hosting on Organization and Enterprise plans. Voting sessions, audio chat and no-account guest links all require a paid team.
Full review →Summary
Estimioo scores 4.6 overall and is best for small, distributed agile teams who want fast AI-assisted planning poker and async standups at near-zero cost, plus a genuinely usable 41-template retro board — and who don't need anonymity, grouping, or action-item follow-through across sprints. It offers a free tier.
FigJam scores 7.2 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.
Estimioo leads on ease of use and value. FigJam leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | Estimioo | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-in-One Agile | Whiteboard |
| Team size | Small | Mid-market |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | Up to 10 participants, 5 sessions/month, 5 AI estimates/month, 1 AI retro summary per retro, 1-hour session expiry, CSV export | Starter: 3 FigJam files per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), templates, timer and music, 30-day version history — no voting sessions, audio chat or open (no-account) sessions |
| Starting price | $7/workspace/mo | $3/user/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $7/mo (Team plan is flat per-workspace with unlimited participants, not per-seat; separate projects per team need the quote-only Enterprise tier) | ~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| HQ | — | San Francisco, US |
| Data residency | — | United States · European Union |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Export formats | CSV · JSON | PDF · Image · CSV |
| Features | 23 | 39 |
| Integrations | 4 | 10 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Estimioo | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓note | ✓ |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | ✓ |
| AI action items | ✓note | ✓note |
| Action tracking | ✓note | — |
| Team Insights | ✓note | — |
| Polling | — | ✓ |
| Action dashboard | — | — |
| Custom templates | ✓note | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | — | — |
| Independent voting | ✓note | ✓note |
| Async mode | ✓note | ✓ |
| Agile Estimations | ✓note | ✓note |
| Health Checks | ✓note | — |
| Team Kudos | — | ✓note |
| Whiteboard | — | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | ✓note |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | ✓note |
| GitHub | — | ✓note |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓note | ✓note |
| Linear | ✓note | ✓note |
| Microsoft Teams | ✓note | ✓note |
| Monday.com | — | ✓note |
| Notion | — | ✓note |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | ✓note | ✓note |
| Trello | — | ✓note |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ |
| GDPR | — | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | ✓note |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Public API | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ |
| MCP server | — | ✓note |
Estimioo — pros
- + Genuinely cheap — flat <strong>$7/workspace/mo</strong> with unlimited participants, plus a usable free tier
- + 41 one-click retro templates, a 2–25 minute session timer and per-card upvoting — all verified in a live board
- + Unusually fun for the price: 340+ synced icebreakers, six ambient soundscapes and 16 live emoji reactions
- + One-click Claude retro summary returns team mood, key themes and ranked action items with <em>Add all to board</em>
- + Jira connects by OAuth or API token with JQL backlog import; guests join by link or QR with no signup
Estimioo — cons
- − Retro cards are <strong>attributed</strong> — author name and avatar on every note, with no anonymity option anywhere in the product
- − No grouping or clustering, no dot-vote budget, no action-item owners or due dates, and no carry-over between retros
- − Slack and Teams are clipboard-copy buttons rather than integrations; Jira write-back is still on the roadmap, and there's no API, webhooks or MCP
- − No SOC 2, ISO 27001, DPA or data-residency option, and the privacy policy was last updated April 2025 — the quote-only Enterprise tier's SSO claim is unverified
- − No independent coverage (no G2, Capterra or Product Hunt listing), and the site's own social proof contradicts itself — <em>450+ teams</em>, <em>183 agile teams</em> and <em>3000+ teams</em> all appear
FigJam — pros
- + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
- + Free Starter tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month), 300+ templates, the timer and music
- + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
- + Playful, engaging UX — stamps, emotes, high-fives, music, cursor chat — lifts retro fun factor
- + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, activity logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, EU data hosting on Enterprise
FigJam — cons
- − No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
- − Anonymity is weak — votes reveal who voted once the session ends, and stickies always carry a name
- − Official connectors embed Figma files in Jira/Confluence/Linear/Notion rather than pushing action items out; GitHub-issue creation is a community widget; no Azure DevOps
- − Free Starter caps a team at 3 FigJam files and excludes voting sessions, audio chat and no-account guest links
- − Built primarily for designers — the canvas paradigm is fiddly for structured retros, and large boards get sluggish
Keep comparing
Other Estimioo comparisons
Other FigJam comparisons
See alternatives
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.