Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs IdeaBoardz

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.7

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

2.9

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board where anyone can spin up a shared URL, add ideas in customisable sections, vote, and export to PDF or Excel. The site is still online and the app still works, but the product appears to be in maintenance mode at best — Terms were last updated in April 2020 and there is no blog, changelog or roadmap to suggest active development.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.7 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

IdeaBoardz scores 2.9 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. IdeaBoardz leads on value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit2.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailEasyRetroIdeaBoardz
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no teamFully free, no paid tier
Starting price$25/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members)Free (no paid tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded20162012
HQBrazilPune, India
Data residency
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)English only
Features247
Integrations50

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroIdeaBoardz
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free, no paywall, no paid tier
  • + No signup required to participate — just share a URL
  • + 1-10 customisable sections cover most retro formats (Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls, etc.)
  • + PDF and Excel export built in
  • + Voting and async input out of the box

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • UI is unchanged from the early 2010s and shows it
  • No timer, no facilitation phases, no drag-and-drop grouping
  • Zero integrations with the agile stack (Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, etc.)
  • Only a few starter board presets; no real template library, no health checks, no AI features
  • Boards are public-by-URL with no SSO, SOC 2, or stated privacy controls
  • Apparently in maintenance mode — Terms last updated April 2020, no changelog or blog
← All comparisons