Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Mural

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

6.9

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and now runs estimation, sprint retrospectives and icebreakers from one workspace. The retro board is deeper than its marketing suggests — drag-to-group with optional AI clustering, dot voting configurable per board or per column, a phase timer with audio alerts, a guided workflow with auto-advance, and action items carrying owner, due date, priority and a link back to the feedback card. Exports run to PDF, CSV, JSON, Markdown, HTML, JPEG and Confluence, with action items pushed to Jira, GitHub or Linear. Billing is flat per team space rather than per seat. There are no recurring retros, no health-check instrument and no compliance certifications.

Full review →
Mural logo

Mural

6.6

Visual collaboration whiteboard with a mature facilitation toolkit and AI-assisted sessions

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, anonymous voting, timers, Private Mode, 250+ workshop templates (eight of them retro-specific), Mural AI (cluster, summarise, mind-map, Classify by emotional tone), and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode, Summon, Celebrate) refined for over a decade. Best-in-class enterprise posture: SSO/SAML with multi-IdP support, SCIM, BYOK, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001, GDPR and US/EU/Australia data residency.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 6.9 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams running retros and planning poker who want one cheap, playful tool — and don't need health checks, recurring retros or a compliance story. It offers a free tier.

Mural scores 6.6 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor and AI & insights. Mural leads on integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.5
AI & Insights7.5
Integrations6.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade3.0
Mural
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights5.5
Integrations8.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailKollabeMural
CategoryRetrospectivesWhiteboard
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit10 participants per meeting, 4 retrospectives/month, 7-day board history, 1 survey per board; no AI, exports, API or MCPUnlimited murals but only the 3 most recently created stay editable (older go view-only); unlimited members and view-only visitors; no Mural AI or MCP
Starting price$29/mo per space (unlimited members)$9.99/user/mo billed annually ($12/user/mo billed monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (3 Premium spaces × $29; each space allows unlimited members)$240/mo billed annually ($288/mo billed monthly)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20232011
HQSydney, AustraliaSan Francisco, US
Data residencyAustraliaUnited States · European Union · Australia
Languages6 (English, German, Spanish, …)9 (English, Spanish, German, …)
Export formatsCSV · PDF · Markdown · Image · JSON · HTML · Confluence · JiraImage · PDF · PowerPoint · HTML · CSV
Features5243
Integrations510

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityKollabeMural
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓note
Health Checks✓note—
Action tracking✓✓note
Async mode✓✓
Whiteboard✓note✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games✓note—
Agile Estimations✓✓note
Team Kudos✓—
AI grouping/clustering✓✓
AI action items✓—
AI Summaries✓✓
Team Insights✓—
In-meeting AI assistant—✓note
Action dashboard✓—
Integrations
Asana—✓note
Azure DevOps✓note✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓note✓
GitHub✓✓note
GitLab——
Jira✓✓note
Linear✓✓note
Microsoft Teams—✓
Monday.com——
Notion—✓note
Shortcut——
Slack—✓
Trello—✓note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2—✓
GDPR—✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning—✓note
ISO 27001—✓
On-premises——
Public API✓note✓note
Webhooks——
MCP server✓note✓note

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — $29/mo buys unlimited members, so three teams of eight cost $87/mo total
  • + Deeper retro board than the marketing implies: drag-to-group plus AI clustering, dot voting per board or per column, a phase timer with audio alerts, and a guided workflow that auto-advances when everyone marks ready
  • + Action items carry owner, due date, priority, comments and a link back to the feedback card — and push one-click to Jira, GitHub or Linear
  • + Official OAuth MCP server (vendor states 46 tools) and a documented REST API on every paid plan; exports to PDF, CSV, JSON, Markdown, HTML, JPEG and Confluence
  • + Unusually playful: synchronised meeting music, AI-generated backgrounds, kudos with confetti, drawings and stickers, and a 1,100-strong themed template library

Kollabe — cons

  • − No recurring or scheduled retros — every session is created by hand — and no Slack or Microsoft Teams integration for retros
  • − No survey-based health check: a Spotify-style board template, a handful of 1–5 pulse polls, and a Team Health score in the paid weekly Insights report that is computed from activity (engagement, action follow-through, blockers, kudos) rather than from asking the team
  • − Both paid tiers cap a space at <strong>5 facilitators/admins</strong> however many members it has; lifting it means an Enterprise contract
  • − No SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published GDPR posture; core data is hosted in Australia with no EU or US option, and AI features send content to OpenAI and Groq. SSO and SLAs are Enterprise contact-sales
  • − A one-person company whose founder is also building a second product, and no product update has shipped since 31 May 2026

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode, Summon, Celebrate — refined over 10+ years
  • + Anonymous where it counts: votes hide who voted, and Private Mode can keep sticky authors hidden even after reveal
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and 42001, GDPR, SSO/SAML (multi-IdP), SCIM, BYOK, US/EU/Australia residency
  • + Two-way work-item cards for Jira and Azure DevOps and, since September 2026, Linear issues and GitHub pull requests, all editable inside the mural
  • + Five export formats (PDF, PNG, PPT, HTML bundle, CSV of stickies) — unusually broad for a canvas tool

Mural — cons

  • − Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • − No health checks, mood tracking, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • − AI (clustering, summary, sentiment Classify) helps inside a session but doesn't track trends across retros
  • − SSO/SAML needs the $17.99/user/mo Business tier; SCIM, audit logs and data residency are Enterprise-only
  • − The public API is still labelled beta and has no webhooks, and the MCP server is a public preview that needs the mural open in a browser tab

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.