Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs Mural

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

7.3

Figma's whiteboard with AI sticky clustering, an official MCP server that reaches FigJam boards, and a $3 Collab seat — free tier caps at 3 boards

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, timer, music, stamps and emotes, voting sessions, one-click AI that sorts and summarises stickies, and 300+ ready-made templates including community retro boards. Design and product teams already living in Figma get retros without buying a second tool, backed by Figma's SAML/SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India, Brazil and Japan. Figma's official MCP server reads FigJam boards on every plan; letting an agent write to them is a beta that needs a Full seat. Voting sessions, open guest sessions, audio chat and webhooks all require a paid team; publishing custom templates requires Organization.

Full review →
Mural logo

Mural

6.6

Visual collaboration whiteboard with a mature facilitation toolkit and AI-assisted sessions

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, anonymous voting, timers, Private Mode, 250+ workshop templates (eight of them retro-specific), Mural AI (cluster, summarise, mind-map, Classify by emotional tone), and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode, Summon, Celebrate) refined for over a decade. Best-in-class enterprise posture: SSO/SAML with multi-IdP support, SCIM, BYOK, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001, GDPR and US/EU/Australia data residency.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 7.3 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement, AI sticky clustering and an agent-accessible canvas. It offers a free tier.

Mural scores 6.6 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

FigJam leads on value, fun factor and open platform. Mural leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations7.0
Open Platform9.5
Enterprise-grade9.0
Mural
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights5.5
Integrations8.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailFigJamMural
CategoryWhiteboardWhiteboard
Team sizeMid-marketMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam files per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day up to 500/month, 300+ templates, timer, music, AI Sort/Summarize/Generate, REST API and 20 MCP tool calls/month, 30-day version history — no voting sessions, audio chat, open (no-account) sessions or webhooksUnlimited murals but only the 3 most recently created stay editable (older go view-only); unlimited members and view-only visitors; no Mural AI or MCP
Starting price$3/user/mo (Collab seat, billed annually; $5 billed monthly)$9.99/user/mo billed annually ($12/user/mo billed monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, billed annually; $120/mo billed monthly at $5)$240/mo billed annually ($288/mo billed monthly)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20122011
HQSan Francisco, USSan Francisco, US
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia · IN · BR · JPUnited States · European Union · Australia
Languages7 (English, Japanese, Korean, …)9 (English, Spanish, German, …)
Export formatsPDF · Image · CSVImage · PDF · PowerPoint · HTML · CSV
Features4243
Integrations1010

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamMural
Features
Custom templates✓note✓
Anonymous input—✓note
Health Checks——
Action tracking—✓note
Async mode✓✓
Whiteboard✓✓
Independent voting✓note✓
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games✓note—
Agile Estimations✓note✓note
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓✓
AI action items✓note—
AI Summaries✓✓
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant✓note✓note
Action dashboard——
Integrations
Asana✓note✓note
Azure DevOps—✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓note✓
GitHub✓note✓note
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear✓note✓note
Microsoft Teams✓note✓
Monday.com✓note—
Notion✓note✓note
Shortcut——
Slack✓note✓
Trello✓note✓note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓✓
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note✓note
ISO 27001✓✓
On-premises——
Public API✓✓note
Webhooks✓—
MCP server✓✓note

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat (billed annually; $5 monthly) unlocks unlimited boards and full FigJam editing without a Full Figma seat
  • + Free Starter tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month), 300+ templates, the timer, music and AI Sort/Summarize
  • + Playful, engaging UX — stamps, emotes, high-fives, music, cursor chat — lifts retro fun factor
  • + Best open platform of any whiteboard here: REST API on every plan, webhooks on paid, and an <strong>official MCP server that reads FigJam boards</strong> on every plan
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, activity logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India, Brazil and Japan

FigJam — cons

  • − No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • − Anonymity is weak — votes reveal who voted once the session ends, and live cursors show who is writing even when a sticky's name tag is switched off
  • − Action items leave the board only by hand: the Jira, GitHub and Asana widgets turn selected stickies into tickets, but Confluence, Linear and Notion are embeds only and there is no Azure DevOps
  • − Free Starter caps a team at 3 FigJam files and excludes voting, audio chat, no-account guest links and webhooks; publishing custom templates needs Organization
  • − Built primarily for designers — the canvas paradigm is fiddly for structured retros, and large boards get sluggish

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode, Summon, Celebrate — refined over 10+ years
  • + Anonymous where it counts: votes hide who voted, and Private Mode can keep sticky authors hidden even after reveal
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and 42001, GDPR, SSO/SAML (multi-IdP), SCIM, BYOK, US/EU/Australia residency
  • + Two-way work-item cards for Jira and Azure DevOps and, since September 2026, Linear issues and GitHub pull requests, all editable inside the mural
  • + Five export formats (PDF, PNG, PPT, HTML bundle, CSV of stickies) — unusually broad for a canvas tool

Mural — cons

  • − Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • − No health checks, mood tracking, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • − AI (clustering, summary, sentiment Classify) helps inside a session but doesn't track trends across retros
  • − SSO/SAML needs the $17.99/user/mo Business tier; SCIM, audit logs and data residency are Enterprise-only
  • − The public API is still labelled beta and has no webhooks, and the MCP server is a public preview that needs the mural open in a browser tab

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.