Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

6.2

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool built around a fast drag-and-drop board and a 300-plus template library. 2026 added working AI — card grouping, meeting summaries with a sentiment gauge and board-column generation from a theme prompt — plus richer surveys with team templates and trend charts, an open-action-items panel on team boards, free PNG/CSV export and organisation audit logs.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

5.8

Jira-native retros with real sprint data

SprintRetro is an Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity and predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time, second-by-second burndown) into the retro board itself. A major June 2026 release widened it into a continuous-improvement workspace: an infinite whiteboard with visual templates, anonymous team-health pulse checks with cross-sprint trends, an on-demand AI facilitator, and an action dashboard that quality-scores every action. Both Marketplace listings are Cloud Fortified. The free app still covers unlimited users, but a paid Pro app now carries custom templates, unlimited grouping and AI sprint summaries.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 6.2 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want retros, a whiteboard and real sprint metrics on one board — and are happy for everything to stay inside Jira's walls. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. SprintRetro leads on value, fun factor and AI & insights.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform4.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor7.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailEasyRetroSprintRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 public board/month (max 1 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, no AI features; unlimited participants and free PNG/CSV exportUnlimited users on a Jira site, but capped: 3 basic templates, no custom template creation, limited polls and card grouping, no AI sprint summary. Vendor has published planned caps of ~3–5 sessions/month and under 8 participants per session.
Starting price$25/mo$8.40/user/yr billed annually ($0.84/user/mo billed monthly) — SprintRetro Pro; free on Jira sites of 10 or fewer users
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$17.50/mo (Pro, $210/yr at the 25-user Jira tier; $20.16/mo billed monthly) — the free app also still covers 24 users
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2016—
HQBrazilWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residencyUnited States—
Languages8 (English, Portuguese, Dutch, …)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraImage · PDF · Jira
Features4038
Integrations51

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroSprintRetro
Features
Custom templates✓✓note
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓note✓note
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode——
Whiteboard—✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓✓
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos—✓
AI grouping/clustering✓✓
AI action items—✓
AI Summaries✓✓note
Team Insights—✓note
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓✓note
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓—
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira✓✓
Linear——
Microsoft Teams✓note—
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack✓note—
Trello✓—
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API✓note—
Webhooks——
MCP server——

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Fastest setup of any tool we run: pick a template, share a link, participants join with no account
  • + AI now does real work on the board — card grouping with reviewable merge suggestions, a meeting summary with an AI-estimated sentiment gauge, and board columns generated from a theme prompt
  • + Surveys became a light pulse-check loop in 2026: numeric-scale and multiple-choice polls, team survey templates that auto-attach to every new board, and trend charts on the Analytics page
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size — and PNG/CSV export went free in July 2026
  • + Plainly still shipping: nine changelog entries in 2026, including an open-action-items panel that carries unfinished actions into the team's next board

EasyRetro — cons

  • − Health checking is survey-shaped — a trend chart per survey, but no multi-dimension health model, radar or org-wide health view
  • − Integrations are export-shaped: Jira, Confluence and Trello take cards out, Slack only announces new boards, and there's no GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps or calendar
  • − The API is one paid-only create-board endpoint; there are no webhooks, no read or export API and no MCP server
  • − Vendor holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 (it leans on Google Cloud's), data sits in US Central with no EU option, SAML SSO starts at $90/mo, audit logs at $150/mo, and SCIM doesn't exist
  • − Free plan is now 1 public board per month and 1 board total on the dashboard (archived included), with AI features excluded

SprintRetro — pros

  • + <strong>Real Jira sprint data inside the retro</strong> — velocity and predictability over five sprints, scope change, carryover tagged with how many sprints an issue has slipped, cycle time per status, and a burndown that records every individual point change
  • + The action loop is the best part: actions link back to the idea that triggered them, carry forward with duplicate protection, get an AI SMART quality score with a one-tap rewrite, and can be pushed into Jira as issues
  • + June 2026 added a genuine infinite whiteboard — stickies, shapes, frames, tables, connectors, live cursors, follow-a-teammate, Tenor GIFs, private mode, a synced board timer, PNG/print-PDF export, and <em>board import from Miro or Mural</em>
  • + Anonymous Team Health pulses across seven dimensions, with cross-sprint trends overlaid against committed-vs-delivered and carryover — the health-vs-delivery view is rare at this price
  • + <strong>Cloud Fortified</strong> and Bugcrowd bug-bounty on both listings, and the free app still covers unlimited users on a Jira site

SprintRetro — cons

  • − Jira Cloud only — every participant needs a Jira licence, and there is no Slack, Teams, Confluence or standalone web app, nor any public API, webhooks or MCP server
  • − <em>The free tier is narrowing.</em> Today: 3 basic templates, no custom template creation, limited polls and grouping, no AI sprint summary. Published as planned: ~3–5 sessions/month and under 8 participants per session
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own — the trust centre's own entries attribute both to AWS, Atlassian Cloud and Render, not to an Agile Pulse audit. No SCIM, audit logs or data residency, and the app is not "Runs on Atlassian" certified
  • − No async mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no cross-team or org-level health rollup — the Pro usage report covers adoption, not outcomes
  • − Export is whiteboard-only (PNG or print-to-PDF); column-mode retros still have no board export beyond pushing an action into Jira

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.