Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

6.9

Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

4.6

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free <strong>Atlassian Forge</strong> app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into a collaborative retro board with templates, anonymous voting, action items that carry over between retros, GIF reactions, kudos, polls, and icebreakers.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 6.9 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 4.6 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

FigJam leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. SprintRetro leads on ease of use and value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations6.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailFigJamSprintRetro
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam boards per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templatesFree for unlimited users on a Jira instance
Starting price$3/user/mo (Collab seat)Free
Est. 3 teams × 8 people~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seatsFree (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2012
HQSan Francisco, USWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residencyUnited States
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features3814
Integrations81

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamSprintRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.comnote
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
  • + Free tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) and the full retro toolkit
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
  • No Microsoft Teams or Azure DevOps integration
  • Free Starter caps teams at 3 FigJam boards — a recurring retro practice outgrows it fast
  • Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros

SprintRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free with unlimited users on your Jira instance
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into the retro context
  • + Built on Atlassian Forge — runs entirely inside Jira Cloud, no external data egress
  • + Action items carry over automatically into the next retro for follow-up
  • + Covers the engagement basics: templates, voting, action items, GIFs, polls, kudos, icebreakers

SprintRetro — cons

  • Jira Cloud only — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Confluence, or standalone web app
  • No AI features (no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action extraction)
  • No timer, drag-and-drop grouping, async mode, presentation mode, or scheduling
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs, or cross-team reporting
  • Young product (launched Sept 2025) with a small install base (~640 installs) — fine for one team, less proven at scale
← All comparisons