Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

6.2

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool built around a fast drag-and-drop board and a 300-plus template library. 2026 added working AI — card grouping, meeting summaries with a sentiment gauge and board-column generation from a theme prompt — plus richer surveys with team templates and trend charts, an open-action-items panel on team boards, free PNG/CSV export and organisation audit logs.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.4

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool: the team drops notes into a Slack channel or the web app all sprint long, then runs the retro on a live synced board with drag-to-group, dot voting, a shared timer and assignable action items that carry over to the next retro. The CarrotIQ AI layer is gated to the $40/team/month Pro AI plan. Four-person vendor, Slack is the only integration, and there is still no public changelog.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 6.2 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Retro Rabbit scores 4.4 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want retro notes captured continuously through the sprint and a lightweight live or async board — and that don't need Jira, health checks or a procurement checklist. It offers paid plans from $30/team/mo.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform4.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailEasyRetroRetro Rabbit
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limit1 public board/month (max 1 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, no AI features; unlimited participants and free PNG/CSV export14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$25/mo$30/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$90/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2016—
HQBrazilBoston, United States
Data residencyUnited StatesUnited States
Languages8 (English, Portuguese, Dutch, …)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraCSV · Excel · PDF
Features4021
Integrations51

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroRetro Rabbit
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓note—
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode—✓
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓—
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓—
AI action items—✓note
AI Summaries✓✓note
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓✓
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓—
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira✓—
Linear——
Microsoft Teams✓note—
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack✓note✓
Trello✓—
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR✓—
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API✓note—
Webhooks——
MCP server——

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Fastest setup of any tool we run: pick a template, share a link, participants join with no account
  • + AI now does real work on the board — card grouping with reviewable merge suggestions, a meeting summary with an AI-estimated sentiment gauge, and board columns generated from a theme prompt
  • + Surveys became a light pulse-check loop in 2026: numeric-scale and multiple-choice polls, team survey templates that auto-attach to every new board, and trend charts on the Analytics page
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size — and PNG/CSV export went free in July 2026
  • + Plainly still shipping: nine changelog entries in 2026, including an open-action-items panel that carries unfinished actions into the team's next board

EasyRetro — cons

  • − Health checking is survey-shaped — a trend chart per survey, but no multi-dimension health model, radar or org-wide health view
  • − Integrations are export-shaped: Jira, Confluence and Trello take cards out, Slack only announces new boards, and there's no GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps or calendar
  • − The API is one paid-only create-board endpoint; there are no webhooks, no read or export API and no MCP server
  • − Vendor holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 (it leans on Google Cloud's), data sits in US Central with no EU option, SAML SSO starts at $90/mo, audit logs at $150/mo, and SCIM doesn't exist
  • − Free plan is now 1 public board per month and 1 board total on the dashboard (archived included), with AI features excluded

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first capture — notes land in the channel throughout the sprint, so the board opens full instead of starting with silent writing
  • + Board covers the basics properly: drag-to-group with editable group names, dot voting with a configurable 1–50 vote budget, a shared pause/resume timer, and a per-user anonymity toggle
  • + Action items carry forward — a dedicated <em>Old / Unresolved Items</em> tab plus per-room and per-person trackers, with Slack reminders to assignees
  • + A GIPHY picker on notes that the marketing site never mentions — the one bit of levity on an otherwise plain board
  • + Flat $30/team/month with unlimited users (3 teams of 8 = $90/mo), and CSV/XLSX/PDF export on every tier including Starter

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • − Slack is the only integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps, and no public API, webhooks or MCP
  • − No health checks, team radars or sentiment tracking; the only longitudinal view is a notes-per-day bar chart per room
  • − AI is two calls — a per-retro summary and one action-item suggestion. The site's <em>intelligent note grouping</em> claim has no counterpart in the shipped web app
  • − Enterprise controls are thin: SSO/SAML is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs and no SOC 2 of its own. The privacy policy carries no GDPR or CCPA commitments and says retro feedback is not shared with third parties, the Slack Marketplace listing answers <em>uses large language models: no</em> and <em>has a dedicated security team: no</em>, and neither says where CarrotIQ processes notes
  • − No free tier and no public changelog, from a four-person vendor whose marketing site has not changed since early 2025

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.