Retrospective Tools

Retro Rabbit vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.4

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool: the team drops notes into a Slack channel or the web app all sprint long, then runs the retro on a live synced board with drag-to-group, dot voting, a shared timer and assignable action items that carry over to the next retro. The CarrotIQ AI layer is gated to the $40/team/month Pro AI plan. Four-person vendor, Slack is the only integration, and there is still no public changelog.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.8

Retrospectives, health checks, estimations and standups in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme. An in-meeting AI assistant (trAI, still in beta) and a GA MCP server are included on every paid plan.

Full review →

Summary

Retro Rabbit scores 4.4 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want retro notes captured continuously through the sprint and a lightweight live or async board — and that don't need Jira, health checks or a procurement checklist. It offers paid plans from $30/team/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.8 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.5
AI & Insights8.5
Integrations9.0
Open Platform10.0
Enterprise-grade8.5
DetailRetro RabbitTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierNoNo
Free limit14-day free trial, no credit card requiredNo free plan — 30-day trial, no credit card required
Starting price$30/team/mo$20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$90/mo$50/mo billed annually ($60/mo billed monthly) — Small Organization plan, a 3-team bundle with unlimited members
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded—2017
HQBoston, United StatesAustralia
Data residencyUnited StatesUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only27 (English, Arabic, Czech, …)
Export formatsCSV · Excel · PDFExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email · Image · Confluence · Notion
Features2170
Integrations115

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetro RabbitTeamRetro
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks—✓
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode✓✓
Whiteboard—✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling—✓
Icebreaker games—✓note
Agile Estimations—✓
Team Kudos—✓
AI grouping/clustering—✓
AI action items✓note✓
AI Summaries✓note✓
Team Insights—✓
In-meeting AI assistant—✓note
Action dashboard✓✓
Integrations
Asana—✓
Azure DevOps—✓
Basecamp—✓
ClickUp—✓
Confluence—✓
GitHub—✓
GitLab—✓
Jira—✓
Linear—✓
Microsoft Teams—✓
Monday.com—✓
Notion—✓
Shortcut—✓
Slack✓✓
Trello—✓
Security & Privacy
SOC 2—✓note
GDPR—✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓
SCIM provisioning—✓note
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API—✓
Webhooks—✓
MCP server—✓

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first capture — notes land in the channel throughout the sprint, so the board opens full instead of starting with silent writing
  • + Board covers the basics properly: drag-to-group with editable group names, dot voting with a configurable 1–50 vote budget, a shared pause/resume timer, and a per-user anonymity toggle
  • + Action items carry forward — a dedicated <em>Old / Unresolved Items</em> tab plus per-room and per-person trackers, with Slack reminders to assignees
  • + A GIPHY picker on notes that the marketing site never mentions — the one bit of levity on an otherwise plain board
  • + Flat $30/team/month with unlimited users (3 teams of 8 = $90/mo), and CSV/XLSX/PDF export on every tier including Starter

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • − Slack is the only integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps, and no public API, webhooks or MCP
  • − No health checks, team radars or sentiment tracking; the only longitudinal view is a notes-per-day bar chart per room
  • − AI is two calls — a per-retro summary and one action-item suggestion. The site's <em>intelligent note grouping</em> claim has no counterpart in the shipped web app
  • − Enterprise controls are thin: SSO/SAML is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs and no SOC 2 of its own. The privacy policy carries no GDPR or CCPA commitments and says retro feedback is not shared with third parties, the Slack Marketplace listing answers <em>uses large language models: no</em> and <em>has a dedicated security team: no</em>, and neither says where CarrotIQ processes notes
  • − No free tier and no public changelog, from a four-person vendor whose marketing site has not changed since early 2025

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks and maturity models as a first-class module — custom dimensions, radar charts, trends across sprints
  • + Retrospectives, health checks and planning-poker estimation on one subscription
  • + SAML SSO, RBAC and US-or-EU hosting on <em>every</em> plan, not just Enterprise
  • + GA MCP server, team-level API keys and HMAC-signed webhooks on all plans; 15 native agile-stack integrations plus Zapier and n8n
  • + <em>trAI</em> in-meeting assistant (beta) on trial and paid plans, plus 18 in-meeting icebreaker games on every account

TeamRetro — cons

  • − No free tier — 30-day trial, then a paid plan
  • − The SOC 2 Type 2 report is Enterprise-only; lower tiers get the SOC 3 report instead
  • − SCIM, IP allowlisting, domain capture and guest/observer roles are Enterprise-only, and audit logs are on request rather than self-serve
  • − Cross-team insights, reports and programs (team-of-teams) require Enterprise
  • − ISO 27001 is inherited from AWS, and hosting is US or EU only — no APAC region despite the Australian HQ

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.