Retrospective Tools

Retro Rabbit vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.4

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint from Slack or the web app, then runs the retro on a synced board with drag-and-drop grouping, voting and assignable action items. The CarrotIQ AI layer is gated to the Pro AI plan. No public changelog and no visible feature change since April 2025 — ask for a roadmap before committing.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.3

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Retro Rabbit scores 4.4 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/team/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.5
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform9.0
Enterprise-grade8.5
DetailRetro RabbitTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierNoNo
Free limit14-day free trial, no credit card requiredNo free plan — 30-day trial, no credit card required
Starting price$30/team/mo$20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$90/mo$50/mo billed annually ($60/mo billed monthly) — Small Organization plan, a 3-team bundle with unlimited members
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2017
HQBoston, United StatesAustralia
Data residencyUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only29 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Export formatsCSV · Excel · PDFExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email · Image
Features1665
Integrations115

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetro RabbitTeamRetro
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2notenote
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP server

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — notes get captured in Slack throughout the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously instead of in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag-and-drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ covers grouping, action-item suggestions and retro summaries on the $40/team/mo Pro AI plan
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited users, and CSV/XLSX/PDF export on every tier including Starter

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • No public API, webhooks or MCP server — data leaves only as a file export
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, and the privacy policy carries no GDPR or CCPA commitments

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks and maturity models as a first-class module — custom dimensions, radar charts, trends across sprints
  • + Three modules on one subscription: retrospectives, health checks, planning-poker estimation
  • + SAML SSO, RBAC and US-or-EU hosting on <em>every</em> plan, not just Enterprise
  • + GA MCP server plus team-level API keys and HMAC-signed webhooks, included on all plans
  • + 15 native integrations: Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, GitLab, Linear, Confluence, Slack, Teams and more

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial, then a paid plan
  • Audit logs, SCIM, IP allowlisting and guest/observer roles are Enterprise-only
  • Cross-team insights, reports and programs (team-of-teams) require Enterprise
  • ISO 27001 is inherited from AWS, not held by TeamRetro
  • Hosting is US or EU only — no APAC region despite the Australian HQ

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.