Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs LetRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.7

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
LetRetro logo

LetRetro

6.2

Turn team feedback into continuous growth — faster

LetRetro is a young, AI-forward retrospective platform built around real-time collaborative rooms, team-happiness tracking and automated AI documentation. It uses a flat per-team pricing model (not per-seat) and bundles sentiment analysis, key-takeaway summaries and Confluence/Notion sync.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.7 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

LetRetro scores 6.2 overall and is best for agile teams, startups and small-to-mid organisations that want AI-assisted retros with built-in health and happiness tracking at flat per-team pricing, without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use and enterprise-grade. LetRetro leads on retro toolkit and AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, LetRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
LetRetro
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade3.0
DetailEasyRetroLetRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no team3 rooms, 15 members per room, Leto AI (10 chats/day), 10+ basic templates, basic trends
Starting price$25/mo$11.99/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members)$35.97/mo (Business — 3 teams at the flat per-team rate, unlimited members)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2016
HQBrazilBengaluru, India
Data residency
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)English only
Features2419
Integrations55

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroLetRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Pollingnotenote
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

LetRetro — pros

  • + Flat per-team pricing ($11.99/team/mo) with unlimited members — cost scales with the number of teams, not headcount, so growing teams aren't penalised per seat
  • + AI is a genuine strength rather than a single bolt-on: sentiment analysis, key takeaways, improvement suggestions and automated retro documentation
  • + Built-in team-health and happiness tracking with sprint-over-sprint trend dashboards
  • + Real-time collaborative rooms (live cursors, drag-and-drop cards, anonymous voting, live polls) that spin up in seconds with no setup
  • + Confluence and Notion sync plus action-item push to Jira, Slack notifications and webhooks for custom workflows

LetRetro — cons

  • Thin enterprise story: SSO arrives only on the Business tier, with no published SCIM, audit logs, or LetRetro-held SOC 2 / ISO 27001 — it relies on SOC 2-compliant hosting infrastructure rather than its own certification
  • Founder-led Bengaluru startup with a very thin public track record — a single third-party review (one 5-star SaaSHub rating, from a customer LetRetro also features on its homepage) and no presence in the major 2026 'best retro tools' roundups — a durability risk for enterprise procurement
  • Retro toolkit lacks some facilitator staples: no confirmed recurring/scheduled retros, parking lot, team agreements, or async-first mode — the product is built around live, real-time sessions
  • Integration set is modest — no Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps — and the Notion/Confluence connectors are documentation sync rather than deep two-way workflow
  • Free tier caps rooms at 3 and AI at 10 chats per day, so regular AI use pushes teams onto the paid plan quickly
← All comparisons