Retrospective Tools

Sprintlio vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Sprintlio logo

Sprintlio

2.9

Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira

Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around <strong>action follow-through</strong>, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Sprintlio scores 2.9 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Sprintlio
Ease of Use5.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations4.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailSprintlioTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierNoNo
Free limitNo free plan or trial publicly documented on the vendor site30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$50/user/mo$25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleQuote-only — contact sales$50/mo billed annually
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded20182017
HQToronto, CanadaAustralia
Data residencyUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features1263
Integrations215

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilitySprintlioTeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks

Sprintlio — pros

  • + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
  • + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
  • + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat

Sprintlio — cons

  • Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
  • Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
  • No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
  • Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons