Retrospective Tools

Retrium vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retrium logo

Retrium

4.9

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool built around a guided five-phase facilitation flow, anonymous brainstorming, dot voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks. Since August 2026 the vendor has also run Retrium Next, a separate free open beta that rebuilds the retro around an AI co-facilitator.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

5.6

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke was rebuilt from scratch as v3 in August 2026: guided retro boards, static surveys and AI-run interview surveys, and Ask, which answers questions across closed retros and surveys with cited evidence. An official OAuth MCP server is included on every tier, including Free.

Full review →

Summary

Retrium scores 4.9 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

ScatterSpoke scores 5.6 overall and is best for engineering orgs that want AI to synthesise feedback across many teams and surveys — and agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

Retrium leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, integrations and enterprise-grade. ScatterSpoke leads on AI & insights and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights2.5
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value6.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations1.0
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailRetriumScatterSpoke
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketMid-market
Free tierNoYes
Free limitNo free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team Radar1 seat and 1 team; unlimited static surveys and responses; retro boards with manual grouping and voting but no AI; 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask queries one-time; MCP connection but no reading results over it
Starting price$39/mo$29/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$117/mo$149/mo on Business (monthly list price) — 3 teams exceed Pro's 2-team cap; the 5 included seats cover the facilitators, since participants and guests never take a seat
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20142019
HQWashington, D.C., USAUSA
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · JiraCSV
Features3340
Integrations20

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetriumScatterSpoke
Features
Custom templates✓✓note
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓✓note
Action tracking✓—
Async mode✓note✓
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓✓
Polling—✓note
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓note✓note
AI action items✓note—
AI Summaries—✓note
Team Insights—✓
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓note—
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira✓note—
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack✓note—
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓✓note
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note✓note
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API—✓note
Webhooks——
MCP server—✓

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow — think, group, vote, discuss, wrap-up
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design, with a documented Fishbone root-cause format
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — ten prebuilt radars plus a custom-spoke template, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing at <strong>$39/mo</strong> with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • − No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique and SSO are excluded from it
  • − Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • − AI exists only in <strong>Retrium Next</strong>, a separate free open beta with no data migration, no uptime commitment and no pricing yet — the product you actually pay for has none
  • − The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV, TXT and send-to-Jira
  • − The shipping product has published no release notes since <strong>August 2024</strong>, and the Continuous Improvement Journey beta closed in December 2023

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier including Free — OAuth sign-in, 33 tools spanning surveys and retro boards; reading results is where the paid line sits
  • + Only facilitators need seats — team members and email-verified guests join boards free, so 3 teams of 8 fit Business's $149/mo base
  • + Private-until-reveal writing and blind voting are on by default, and Group with AI leaves hand-made groups alone
  • + Ask cites the retro or survey behind its answers, and closed-retro summaries track which themes repeat across runs (paid plans)
  • + AI-run interview surveys follow up on each answer — a real option for async health checks between retros

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • − <strong>No action items</strong> — the v3 board has no action object, so decisions go into card comments
  • − No integrations in v3: nothing pushes to Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps or posts to Slack or Teams, whatever the homepage badges say
  • − One CSV export from a closed retro; audit logs are Enterprise-only
  • − Retro AI is paid and Ask is metered — a shared monthly pool of 250 queries on Pro, 2,000 on Business
  • − The docs describe Signals and Automations pages that the shipped web app doesn't include as of October 2026

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.