Retrospective Tools

Neatro vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Neatro logo

Neatro

5.4

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.1

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, icebreaker games, background music and a clean facilitation flow. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

Neatro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 6.1 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

Neatro leads on enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on fun factor, AI & insights and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailNeatroTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFree forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all ready-to-use templates, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting price$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly)£26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly£72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202020
HQQuebec, CanadaUK
Data residencyCanada
Languages2 (English, French)14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · JiraEmail · Jira
Features2935
Integrations57

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNeatroTeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenotenote
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnotenote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnotenote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.comnote
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP server

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action Kanban board plus an automatic reminder of last retro's open actions keeps follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), no GDPR statement, and hosting is Quebec-only
  • No cross-team rollups, org health dashboard, SCIM, audit logs, public API or webhooks

TeleRetro — pros

  • + The deepest <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong> of any tool here — GIF and emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros, with 20+ ready templates and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Genuinely cheap for a small org — £72/mo covers 3 teams with unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • Only Slack is documented as a native integration; Jira is claimed on the vendor's comparison pages but absent from its own integrations page, and everything else routes through Zapier
  • Actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em>, and nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it
  • AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only
  • No product update shipped since August 2025 — the marketing site is actively maintained, the changelog is not

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.