Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Spreo

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

6.9

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and now runs estimation, sprint retrospectives and icebreakers from one workspace. The retro board is deeper than its marketing suggests — drag-to-group with optional AI clustering, dot voting configurable per board or per column, a phase timer with audio alerts, a guided workflow with auto-advance, and action items carrying owner, due date, priority and a link back to the feedback card. Exports run to PDF, CSV, JSON, Markdown, HTML, JPEG and Confluence, with action items pushed to Jira, GitHub or Linear. Billing is flat per team space rather than per seat. There are no recurring retros, no health-check instrument and no compliance certifications.

Full review →
Spreo logo

Spreo

5.7

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. An official MCP server (beta) and a signed-in HTTP API landed during 2026, but Jira, SSO and PDF export all require the $6/user Business plan, and in-product AI stops at beta sticky-note clustering.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 6.9 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams running retros and planning poker who want one cheap, playful tool — and don't need health checks, recurring retros or a compliance story. It offers a free tier.

Spreo scores 5.7 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun on a Jira backlog, and who would get real value from driving boards with an AI assistant over MCP — budget for the Business plan, which is where Jira, SSO and PDF export actually live. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly).

Kollabe leads on retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights and integrations. Spreo leads on enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.5
AI & Insights7.5
Integrations6.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade3.0
Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailKollabeSpreo
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limit10 participants per meeting, 4 retrospectives/month, 7-day board history, 1 survey per board; no AI, exports, API or MCP30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires
Starting price$29/mo per space (unlimited members)$4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (3 Premium spaces × $29; each space allows unlimited members)$144/mo billed annually (Business — 24 x $6; Starter's $96/mo covers only one shared team space)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20232019
HQSydney, AustraliaUK
Data residencyAustraliaEuropean Union
Languages6 (English, German, Spanish, …)English only
Export formatsCSV · PDF · Markdown · Image · JSON · HTML · Confluence · JiraPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira
Features5244
Integrations51

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityKollabeSpreo
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓note
Health Checks✓note—
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode✓—
Whiteboard✓note✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games✓note✓note
Agile Estimations✓✓
Team Kudos✓✓note
AI grouping/clustering✓✓note
AI action items✓—
AI Summaries✓—
Team Insights✓—
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓✓note
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps✓note—
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓note—
GitHub✓—
GitLab——
Jira✓✓note
Linear✓—
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack——
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR—✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises—✓note
Public API✓note✓note
Webhooks——
MCP server✓note✓note

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — $29/mo buys unlimited members, so three teams of eight cost $87/mo total
  • + Deeper retro board than the marketing implies: drag-to-group plus AI clustering, dot voting per board or per column, a phase timer with audio alerts, and a guided workflow that auto-advances when everyone marks ready
  • + Action items carry owner, due date, priority, comments and a link back to the feedback card — and push one-click to Jira, GitHub or Linear
  • + Official OAuth MCP server (vendor states 46 tools) and a documented REST API on every paid plan; exports to PDF, CSV, JSON, Markdown, HTML, JPEG and Confluence
  • + Unusually playful: synchronised meeting music, AI-generated backgrounds, kudos with confetti, drawings and stickers, and a 1,100-strong themed template library

Kollabe — cons

  • − No recurring or scheduled retros — every session is created by hand — and no Slack or Microsoft Teams integration for retros
  • − No survey-based health check: a Spotify-style board template, a handful of 1–5 pulse polls, and a Team Health score in the paid weekly Insights report that is computed from activity (engagement, action follow-through, blockers, kudos) rather than from asking the team
  • − Both paid tiers cap a space at <strong>5 facilitators/admins</strong> however many members it has; lifting it means an Enterprise contract
  • − No SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published GDPR posture; core data is hosted in Australia with no EU or US option, and AI features send content to OpenAI and Groq. SSO and SLAs are Enterprise contact-sales
  • − A one-person company whose founder is also building a second product, and no product update has shipped since 31 May 2026

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Gadget shelf built for live sessions: a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers and a voter panel, with confetti and throwable hats on top
  • + Official MCP server (beta) lets Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot read, build and edit boards under your own permissions, with an account-level kill switch and a connected-members list for admins
  • + Fully configurable voting rounds — votes per person, duplicate votes, and voting on topics as well as individual stickies
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, story points and issue creation in-board
  • + Hide Identities host control makes writing <em>and</em> voting permanently anonymous, toggleable per activity
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Spreo)

Spreo — cons

  • − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • − No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • − Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • − <strong>Jira, SSO and PDF export all start at the $6/user Business plan</strong>, so the $4 Starter headline is misleading past a single team space
  • − In-product AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching; MCP moves the AI into your own assistant rather than the board
  • − The HTTP API has no public reference — you need a Spreo login to see what it does, which makes it hard to evaluate before buying
  • − No ongoing free plan; expired trials pause to read-only
  • − Desktop and laptop only — the vendor states Spreo runs on <em>"all desktop and laptop devices"</em>, with no mobile or tablet support
  • − Two renames in under a year leave the review trail split across three names — G2 files it under <em>Ludi</em>, Capterra and Product Hunt under <em>Metro Retro</em>

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.