Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.4

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a limited free plan and flat per-team paid pricing.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

4.7

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers a free tier.

Retrium scores 4.7 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

GoRetro leads on value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and open platform. Retrium leads on retro toolkit and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights3.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailGoRetroRetrium
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeAnyMid-market
Free tierYesNo
Free limitFree plan: 1 team, 5 public boards, 2 team boards per 31-day cycle, unlimited users and guests, 20+ templates. Excludes exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls and icebreakers.No free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team Radar
Starting price$29/team/mo$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually)$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202014
HQIsraelWashington, D.C., USA
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · ImageCSV · Jira
Features3526
Integrations22

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityGoRetroRetrium
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Pollingnote
Action dashboardnotenote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

GoRetro — pros

  • + Flat per-team pricing ($29/team/mo) with unlimited members per team, plus a free plan for one team
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with per-board anonymity toggles (hide author, hide cards, hide votes)
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — cons

  • <strong>No published product updates since 2023</strong> — changelog last moved 23 May 2023, blog 28 Jul 2023
  • Free plan is thin: exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls and icebreakers are all Premium-gated
  • Integration breadth is narrow — Jira and Slack only, with no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and a meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No public API or webhooks; async is a multi-day feedback deadline, not a structured async flow, and there is no scheduling or recurring retros

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — up to seven customisable spokes, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique stays paid-only during it
  • Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or sentiment
  • The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV and TXT
  • No published product updates since <strong>August 2024</strong> — the help centre's yearly updates series ends at 2024

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.