Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Lucidspark

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

6.2

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool built around a fast drag-and-drop board and a 300-plus template library. 2026 added working AI — card grouping, meeting summaries with a sentiment gauge and board-column generation from a theme prompt — plus richer surveys with team templates and trend charts, an open-action-items panel on team boards, free PNG/CSV export and organisation audit logs.

Full review →
Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.5

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant and tight Lucidchart integration — voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, private-mode brainstorming, anonymous voting sessions, timers, the Lucid AI assistant (prompt-to-board, magic sort, board summaries) and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Free and Individual get static dot voting only; the timer, private voting and facilitator tools start at the Team tier, and starting a private-mode session, Breakout Boards and the Lucid Cards sync to Jira/Azure DevOps/monday.com are Enterprise-only. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP Moderate, IRAP PROTECTED, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 6.2 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark scores 6.5 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and AI & insights. Lucidspark leads on fun factor, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Lucidspark edges ahead with an overall score of 6.5. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform4.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Lucidspark
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights5.5
Integrations6.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
DetailEasyRetroLucidspark
CategoryRetrospectivesWhiteboard
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 public board/month (max 1 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, no AI features; unlimited participants and free PNG/CSV export3 editable boards, unlimited shapes per board, basic Visual Activities, emoji reactions, presentation mode, Lucid AI and static dot voting — no timer, voting sessions or facilitator tools, and private mode is join-only
Starting price$25/mo$9/user/mo (Individual, billed annually; $15 billed monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$240/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $10/user billed annually; $360/mo billed monthly)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162010
HQBrazilSouth Jordan, US
Data residencyUnited StatesUnited States · European Union · Australia
Languages8 (English, Portuguese, Dutch, …)12 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraImage · PDF · CSV · JSON
Features4045
Integrations58

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroLucidspark
Features
Custom templates✓✓note
Anonymous input✓✓note
Health Checks✓note—
Action tracking✓✓note
Async mode—✓
Whiteboard—✓
Independent voting✓✓note
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations—✓note
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓✓
AI action items—✓note
AI Summaries✓✓
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant—✓note
Action dashboard✓—
Integrations
Asana—✓note
Azure DevOps—✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓✓note
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira✓✓note
Linear——
Microsoft Teams✓note✓
Monday.com—✓note
Notion—✓note
Shortcut——
Slack✓note✓
Trello✓—
Security & Privacy
SOC 2—✓
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning—✓note
ISO 27001—✓
On-premises——
Public API✓note✓note
Webhooks——
MCP server—✓note

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Fastest setup of any tool we run: pick a template, share a link, participants join with no account
  • + AI now does real work on the board — card grouping with reviewable merge suggestions, a meeting summary with an AI-estimated sentiment gauge, and board columns generated from a theme prompt
  • + Surveys became a light pulse-check loop in 2026: numeric-scale and multiple-choice polls, team survey templates that auto-attach to every new board, and trend charts on the Analytics page
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size — and PNG/CSV export went free in July 2026
  • + Plainly still shipping: nine changelog entries in 2026, including an open-action-items panel that carries unfinished actions into the team's next board

EasyRetro — cons

  • − Health checking is survey-shaped — a trend chart per survey, but no multi-dimension health model, radar or org-wide health view
  • − Integrations are export-shaped: Jira, Confluence and Trello take cards out, Slack only announces new boards, and there's no GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps or calendar
  • − The API is one paid-only create-board endpoint; there are no webhooks, no read or export API and no MCP server
  • − Vendor holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 (it leans on Google Cloud's), data sits in US Central with no EU option, SAML SSO starts at $90/mo, audit logs at $150/mo, and SCIM doesn't exist
  • − Free plan is now 1 public board per month and 1 board total on the dashboard (archived included), with AI features excluded

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Engagement basics on every plan, free included — emoji reactions on notes, Giphy search and a free icebreaker template library; from Team the timer can play music for the whole board
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP Moderate, IRAP PROTECTED, PCI DSS, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Official Lucid MCP server is GA on every plan and shipping monthly — search boards, summarise them, generate synced Jira cards from Claude or ChatGPT
  • + Lucid AI (AI sort, summaries, prompt-to-board and a chat assistant) is unmetered on every tier today, free plan included

Lucidspark — cons

  • − Timer, private voting and facilitator tools start at the $10/user Team tier — Free and Individual get static dot voting and nothing else facilitator-shaped
  • − Starting a private-mode (blind brainstorm) session, Breakout Boards and the Lucid Cards sync to Jira, Azure DevOps and monday.com are Enterprise-only; audit logs need the paid Enterprise Shield add-on on top
  • − No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • − AI is general brainstorming/summarising, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • − Retro template depth trails Miro and Mural; the REST API needs a Team or Enterprise account and there are no outbound webhooks

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.