Retrospective Tools

RetroTool vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTool logo

RetroTool

3.2

Anonymous online retrospectives, no login required

RetroTool is a low-friction online retrospective board built by NY/Poland software agency u2i as a side project. Free anonymous retros run from a unique URL with no signup; paid tiers add private boards, team management and longer retention. The product still works, but the site shows no shipped activity in years.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

5.0

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, scope change, carryover, cycle time, committed vs delivered) into a collaborative retro board, and the free listing also carries an infinite whiteboard, anonymous team-health pulse checks, timers, and an AI facilitator, alongside templates, anonymous voting, cross-sprint action tracking that can create Jira issues, GIFs, kudos, polls, and icebreakers. Both Marketplace listings are Cloud Fortified. A separate paid Pro app sits alongside the free one.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTool scores 3.2 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a free, no-signup retro board with secret voting and a few standard templates — provided you're comfortable using a tool that hasn't shipped visible updates in years. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 5.0 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

RetroTool leads on open platform. SprintRetro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, SprintRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTool
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade3.5
DetailRetroToolSprintRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitAnonymous boards; unlimited cards, columns, action points and participants; 3 basic templates; secret voting, dot-vote limits, timer, grouping, action points; Markdown export; 12-month retentionFree for unlimited users on a Jira instance (free app listing)
Starting price$10/team/mo ($100/team/yr billed annually)$8.40/user/yr (Pro app; free on Jira sites of 10 or fewer users)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$30/mo (Individual — 3 teams x $10/team, unlimited members per team; $25/mo billed annually)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseNoNo
Founded
HQPolandWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsMarkdown · ConfluenceJira
Features1827
Integrations01

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroToolSprintRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Polling
Action dashboardnotenote
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPRnote
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

RetroTool — pros

  • + Genuinely free anonymous retros with no account required
  • + Three-click setup — unique URL, share, run
  • + Zero-knowledge encryption with custom passwords on Company plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing ($10 or $20/team/mo, 15%+ off annually) with <em>unlimited members per team</em>, not per-seat

RetroTool — cons

  • <strong>Apparently dormant</strong>: blog stopped in March 2022, no changelog or release notes, legal docs unchanged since August 2020
  • No native integrations with Jira, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
  • No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction, sentiment)
  • No health checks, recurring retros, or cross-team reporting
  • Most templates, image cards, named participants, private invite-only boards and zero-knowledge encryption are all behind paid tiers
  • Not SOC 2; no SSO/SCIM/audit logs for enterprise buyers

SprintRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free for unlimited users on your Jira instance — the paid Pro app is optional, not the entry point
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, scope change, carryover, cycle time, committed vs delivered) into the retro itself
  • + Strong action loop: unfinished actions carry into the next retro, get quality-scored, and can be pushed into Jira as issues
  • + <strong>Cloud Fortified</strong> on the Atlassian Marketplace — bug bounty, reliability SLOs, and a one-business-day response commitment on critical tickets
  • + Built on Forge: no separate login, and the vendor states no third-party API calls or external data sharing

SprintRetro — cons

  • Jira Cloud only — every participant needs a Jira licence, and there's no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, or standalone web app
  • <em>No board export at all</em> — no PDF, CSV, or image download; the only data that leaves is a Jira issue
  • No async mode, presentation mode, drag-and-drop grouping, or scheduled/recurring retros
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own — the trust centre shows framework logos with no status label and no attestation report behind them; no SCIM, audit logs, or cross-team reporting either
  • Free-versus-Pro split is undocumented: both Marketplace listings advertise the same feature set, and Pro is never mentioned on sprintretro.co

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.