Retrospective Tools

RetroTool vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTool logo

RetroTool

3.2

Anonymous online retrospectives, no login required

RetroTool is a low-friction online retrospective board built by u2i, a ~60-person NY/Kraków software agency, as an internal tool it later opened up. Free anonymous retros run from a unique URL with no signup; paid tiers add private boards, team management, configurable retention and zero-knowledge encryption. The product works and is still used daily, but nothing has shipped visibly since 2024.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

5.6

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke was rebuilt from scratch as v3 in August 2026: guided retro boards, static surveys and AI-run interview surveys, and Ask, which answers questions across closed retros and surveys with cited evidence. An official OAuth MCP server is included on every tier, including Free.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTool scores 3.2 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a free, no-signup retro board with private drafting, secret voting and a dozen standard templates — provided you're comfortable running on a tool whose last visible build is dated May 2024. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke scores 5.6 overall and is best for engineering orgs that want AI to synthesise feedback across many teams and surveys — and agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

RetroTool leads on value. ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTool
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value6.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations1.0
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailRetroToolScatterSpoke
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limitAnonymous boards; unlimited cards, columns, action points and participants; 3 basic templates; private sections, secret voting, dot-vote limits, timer, grouping, action points with owner and due date; Markdown export; 12-month retention. A free registered 'Participant' account (not advertised on the plans page) adds access to private retros and cross-device drafts1 seat and 1 team; unlimited static surveys and responses; retro boards with manual grouping and voting but no AI; 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask queries one-time; MCP connection but no reading results over it
Starting price$10/team/mo ($100/team/yr billed annually)$29/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$30/mo (Individual — 3 teams x $10/team/mo, unlimited members per team; $300/yr = $25/mo billed annually)$149/mo on Business (monthly list price) — 3 teams exceed Pro's 2-team cap; the 5 included seats cover the facilitators, since participants and guests never take a seat
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded—2019
HQPolandUSA
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsMarkdown · ConfluenceCSV
Features2140
Integrations00

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroToolScatterSpoke
Features
Custom templates✓note✓note
Anonymous input✓note✓
Health Checks—✓note
Action tracking✓—
Async mode—✓
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓✓
Polling—✓note
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering—✓note
AI action items——
AI Summaries—✓note
Team Insights—✓
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓note—
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira——
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack——
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2—✓note
GDPR✓note✓
SSO / SAML—✓note
SCIM provisioning—✓note
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API—✓note
Webhooks——
MCP server—✓

RetroTool — pros

  • + Genuinely free anonymous retros with no account required
  • + Three-click setup — unique URL, share, run
  • + Per-column Private Sections keep drafting unbiased until people publish
  • + Zero-knowledge encryption with custom passwords on the Company plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing ($10 or $20/team/mo, 15%+ off annually) with <em>unlimited members per team</em>, not per-seat

RetroTool — cons

  • − <strong>Dormant</strong>: the marketing build is dated 28 May 2024, the app still runs Meteor 2.9, the blog stopped in March 2022 and the legal pages are unchanged since August 2020
  • − No integrations with Jira, Slack, Teams or any other agile-stack tool, no AI of any kind, and no health checks, recurring retros, async mode or cross-team reporting
  • − Export is Markdown only (plain or Confluence wiki markup), copied to the clipboard or saved as a file
  • − Most templates, image cards, named participants, private invite-only boards and zero-knowledge encryption sit behind paid tiers
  • − Not SOC 2; Google sign-in only, with no SAML SSO, SCIM or audit logs

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier including Free — OAuth sign-in, 33 tools spanning surveys and retro boards; reading results is where the paid line sits
  • + Only facilitators need seats — team members and email-verified guests join boards free, so 3 teams of 8 fit Business's $149/mo base
  • + Private-until-reveal writing and blind voting are on by default, and Group with AI leaves hand-made groups alone
  • + Ask cites the retro or survey behind its answers, and closed-retro summaries track which themes repeat across runs (paid plans)
  • + AI-run interview surveys follow up on each answer — a real option for async health checks between retros

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • − <strong>No action items</strong> — the v3 board has no action object, so decisions go into card comments
  • − No integrations in v3: nothing pushes to Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps or posts to Slack or Teams, whatever the homepage badges say
  • − One CSV export from a closed retro; audit logs are Enterprise-only
  • − Retro AI is paid and Ask is metered — a shared monthly pool of 250 queries on Pro, 2,000 on Business
  • − The docs describe Signals and Automations pages that the shipped web app doesn't include as of October 2026

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.