Retrospective Tools

Reetro vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Reetro logo

Reetro

6.0

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a genuinely free tier, a scheduler that auto-creates recurring boards, and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, customizable health checks and an action tracker. SSO, 2FA and audit logs start on the $10/team Pro plan rather than an enterprise tier. ISO 27001 is claimed at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.4

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint from Slack or the web app, then runs the retro on a synced board with drag-and-drop grouping, voting and assignable action items. The CarrotIQ AI layer is gated to the Pro AI plan. No public changelog and no visible feature change since April 2025 — ask for a roadmap before committing.

Full review →

Summary

Reetro scores 6.0 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks, SSO from the $10/team tier and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

Retro Rabbit scores 4.4 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/team/mo.

Reetro leads on retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.5
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailReetroRetro Rabbit
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limit3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards per team, 4 columns, 50 guests, 1 health check/month14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$10/team/mo$30/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (within free tier)$90/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2019
HQCopenhagen, DenmarkBoston, United States
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · Word · Email · Jira · ConfluenceCSV · Excel · PDF
Features4116
Integrations61

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityReetroRetro Rabbit
Features
AI Summariesnotenote
AI grouping/clusteringnotenote
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent votingnote
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2notenote
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Reetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free tier, no credit card — 3 teams, 9 members and 50 guests covers a 24-person org
  • + <strong>SSO (Google, OneLogin, Azure AD, Okta), 2FA and audit logs start on the $10/team Pro plan</strong>, not an enterprise tier
  • + Scheduler auto-creates the next retro board weekly or every 2–4 weeks with layout and settings pre-applied
  • + AI meeting summaries, sentiment analysis and automatic card grouping on paid, alongside customizable health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + Trust center is actively maintained — policy pack, sub-processor list and an AI governance portal all published or refreshed in 2026

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 active boards and 4 columns, with both anonymity and multi-voting paid-only
  • Pro Unlimited's own marketing is self-contradictory — the FAQ and plan table call it flat org-wide $49/mo while the plan card badge says PER TEAM with a 180-member cap
  • Team, comparative and monthly reporting are ticked on the paid columns yet tagged <em>coming soon</em> in the same table — verify the reporting story before you buy
  • On-premises is sold as a Pro Unlimited feature but the tooltip on that plan card says 'coming soon'
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (their trust center lists SOC 2 as 'compliant', not certified) and no SCIM
  • No public API, webhooks or MCP server; no GitHub/Linear; help-doc footers still read 2020–2021 and there's no public changelog

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — notes get captured in Slack throughout the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously instead of in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag-and-drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ covers grouping, action-item suggestions and retro summaries on the $40/team/mo Pro AI plan
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited users, and CSV/XLSX/PDF export on every tier including Starter

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • No public API, webhooks or MCP server — data leaves only as a file export
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, and the privacy policy carries no GDPR or CCPA commitments

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.