Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.0

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs structured, time-bound retros through Ideate, Group, Vote, Discuss, and Feedback stages, with anonymous input, action item tracking, and a 5-Why root cause workflow. Mobile apps for iOS and Android complement the web product, and action items convert directly into Nimble workitems.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.4

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 3.0 overall and is best for small agile teams that want a no-frills retro with built-in root cause analysis and a mobile companion app, especially teams already using the wider NimbleWork (SwiftKanban / Nimble) suite. It offers paid plans from $7/user/mo.

Reetro scores 6.4 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

Reetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Enterprise-grade3.0
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor5.5
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailNimbleRetroReetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitFree trial only; no permanent free tier publicly disclosed for the retro module3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price$7/user/mo$39/team/mo ($32/team/mo annual); flat $49/mo org-wide on Pro Unlimited
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleQuote-only — contact salesFree (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2019
HQBengaluru, IndiaCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features1341
Integrations27

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNimbleRetroReetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboardnote
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUpnote
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnotenote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public APInote
Webhooksnote

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + Structured 5-Why root cause workflow built into the retro flow
  • + Anonymous input and time-bound stages keep retros focused
  • + Native iOS and Android apps for mobile participation
  • + GDPR compliant; sits under NimbleWork's ISO 27001 / SOC umbrella at the platform level

NimbleRetro — cons

  • Only four templates with limited customisation of stages
  • No SSO/SAML, SCIM, or SOC 2 Type 2 attestation specific to the retro product
  • No retro-specific AI (clustering, summaries, sentiment) despite NimbleWork marketing the wider platform as AI-powered
  • Thin direct-integration story for the agile stack — no documented Jira, GitHub, Linear, or Azure DevOps hooks for the retro module
  • Pricing not transparently published; demo-gated

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Business tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Per-team Pro pricing rose to $39/team/mo ($32 annual); the cheapest path for scale is the flat Pro Unlimited
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons