Retrospective Tools

Ludi vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Ludi logo

Ludi

5.7

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.4

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

Ludi scores 5.7 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually.

Reetro scores 6.4 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

Ludi leads on ease of use and fun factor. Reetro leads on value, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Ludi
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade3.5
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor5.5
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailLudiReetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limit30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price$4/user/mo billed annually$39/team/mo ($32/team/mo annual); flat $49/mo org-wide on Pro Unlimited
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$96/mo billed annuallyFree (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202019
HQUKCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residencyEuropean Union
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features3341
Integrations17

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityLudiReetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnotenote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnotenote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnotenote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUpnote
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2notenote
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks

Ludi — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Ludi)

Ludi — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Business tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Per-team Pro pricing rose to $39/team/mo ($32 annual); the cheapest path for scale is the flat Pro Unlimited
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons