Retrospective Tools

IdeaBoardz vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

3.1

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board: pick one of five presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos) or name your own 1-10 sections, share the URL, add ideas anonymously, upvote, and export to PDF or Excel. The app still works and is still in daily use, but development stopped years ago — the public source repository's last feature commits date to April 2020 and the Terms have not been revised since.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

5.8

Jira-native retros with real sprint data

SprintRetro is an Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity and predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time, second-by-second burndown) into the retro board itself. A major June 2026 release widened it into a continuous-improvement workspace: an infinite whiteboard with visual templates, anonymous team-health pulse checks with cross-sprint trends, an on-demand AI facilitator, and an action dashboard that quality-scores every action. Both Marketplace listings are Cloud Fortified. The free app still covers unlimited users, but a paid Pro app now carries custom templates, unlimited grouping and AI sprint summaries.

Full review →

Summary

IdeaBoardz scores 3.1 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want retros, a whiteboard and real sprint metrics on one board — and are happy for everything to stay inside Jira's walls. It offers a free tier.

IdeaBoardz leads on open platform. SprintRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, SprintRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.5
Retro Toolkit3.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor7.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailIdeaBoardzSprintRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFully free, no paid tierUnlimited users on a Jira site, but capped: 3 basic templates, no custom template creation, limited polls and card grouping, no AI sprint summary. Vendor has published planned caps of ~3–5 sessions/month and under 8 participants per session.
Starting priceFree$8.40/user/yr billed annually ($0.84/user/mo billed monthly) — SprintRetro Pro; free on Jira sites of 10 or fewer users
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)$17.50/mo (Pro, $210/yr at the 25-user Jira tier; $20.16/mo billed monthly) — the free app also still covers 24 users
EnterpriseNoNo
Founded2010—
HQPune, IndiaWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · ExcelImage · PDF · Jira
Features1038
Integrations01

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityIdeaBoardzSprintRetro
Features
Custom templates✓note✓note
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks—✓note
Action tracking—✓
Async mode✓—
Whiteboard—✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling—✓
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos—✓
AI grouping/clustering—✓
AI action items—✓
AI Summaries—✓note
Team Insights—✓note
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard—✓note
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira—✓
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack——
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR—✓
SSO / SAML—✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API✓note—
Webhooks——
MCP server——

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free — no paywall, no paid tier, no trial clock
  • + No signup required to participate — just share the URL
  • + Five one-click presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos), or type your own 1-10 section titles
  • + Drag one sticky onto another to merge them; the votes are added together
  • + PDF and Excel export on every board, plus a working phone view

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • − The presets only pre-fill column titles — there is no timer, no phases and no facilitator flow behind them
  • − No action-item tracking, no owners, no due dates, no carry-over between boards
  • − Unlimited anonymous upvotes with no per-person vote budget
  • − Zero integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2 and no published privacy policy — the URL is the only access control
  • − No product work since April 2020; support is a Gmail address and a Twitter handle

SprintRetro — pros

  • + <strong>Real Jira sprint data inside the retro</strong> — velocity and predictability over five sprints, scope change, carryover tagged with how many sprints an issue has slipped, cycle time per status, and a burndown that records every individual point change
  • + The action loop is the best part: actions link back to the idea that triggered them, carry forward with duplicate protection, get an AI SMART quality score with a one-tap rewrite, and can be pushed into Jira as issues
  • + June 2026 added a genuine infinite whiteboard — stickies, shapes, frames, tables, connectors, live cursors, follow-a-teammate, Tenor GIFs, private mode, a synced board timer, PNG/print-PDF export, and <em>board import from Miro or Mural</em>
  • + Anonymous Team Health pulses across seven dimensions, with cross-sprint trends overlaid against committed-vs-delivered and carryover — the health-vs-delivery view is rare at this price
  • + <strong>Cloud Fortified</strong> and Bugcrowd bug-bounty on both listings, and the free app still covers unlimited users on a Jira site

SprintRetro — cons

  • − Jira Cloud only — every participant needs a Jira licence, and there is no Slack, Teams, Confluence or standalone web app, nor any public API, webhooks or MCP server
  • − <em>The free tier is narrowing.</em> Today: 3 basic templates, no custom template creation, limited polls and grouping, no AI sprint summary. Published as planned: ~3–5 sessions/month and under 8 participants per session
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own — the trust centre's own entries attribute both to AWS, Atlassian Cloud and Render, not to an Agile Pulse audit. No SCIM, audit logs or data residency, and the app is not "Runs on Atlassian" certified
  • − No async mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no cross-team or org-level health rollup — the Pro usage report covers adoption, not outcomes
  • − Export is whiteboard-only (PNG or print-to-PDF); column-mode retros still have no board export beyond pushing an action into Jira

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.