Retrospective Tools

IdeaBoardz vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

2.9

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board: pick 1-10 sections, name them yourself, share the URL, add ideas anonymously, upvote, and export to PDF or Excel. The app still works and is still in daily use, but development stopped years ago — the public source repository's last feature commits date to April 2020 and the Terms have not been revised since.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

6.3

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and surveys into themes, sentiment and prioritised action items — and, since ScatterSpoke 3.0, exposes the whole survey lifecycle to AI agents over an official MCP server.

Full review →

Summary

IdeaBoardz scores 2.9 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke scores 6.3 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI synthesis across many retros — or agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

IdeaBoardz leads on value. ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 6.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit2.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights9.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform8.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailIdeaBoardzScatterSpoke
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFully free, no paid tier1 seat, unlimited static surveys and responses, 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask credits (one-time), basic signal detection, MCP access, social logins
Starting priceFree$29/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)$814/mo on Business (includes 5 seats; 19 extra seats at $35/seat/mo)
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded20102019
HQPune, IndiaUSA
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · ExcelPDF · CSV · Email · Jira · Confluence
Features938
Integrations04

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityIdeaBoardzScatterSpoke
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooksnote
MCP server

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free — no paywall, no paid tier, no trial clock
  • + No signup required to participate — just share the URL
  • + 1-10 free-text sections build Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls or Six Thinking Hats by hand
  • + Drag one sticky onto another to merge them; the votes are added together
  • + PDF and Excel export on every board, plus a working phone view

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • No templates at all — the only format choice is how many sections you want
  • No timer, no phases, no action items, no grouping beyond merging two stickies into one
  • Unlimited anonymous upvotes with no per-person vote budget
  • Zero integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2 and no published privacy policy — the URL is the only access control
  • No product work since April 2020; support is a Gmail address and a Twitter handle

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier, including Free — agents can create, distribute and query surveys
  • + AI theme extraction, issue detection, sentiment over time and adaptive AI-moderated interviews
  • + SOC 2 Type II since launch, with annual penetration testing
  • + 20+ retro formats, guided phases, and cross-team/program rollups

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • $814/mo for 3 teams of 8 on Business — 5 seats included, then $35/seat
  • Free tier is a single seat, so it can no longer run a team retro
  • No dedicated health-check model, team radars or psychological-safety survey
  • Integrations stop at Jira, Slack and Teams — no GitHub, Azure DevOps or Linear
  • The 3.0 pricing tiers never mention retrospectives; help-centre release notes stop at Sept 2024

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.