Retrospective Tools

IdeaBoardz vs Ludi

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

2.9

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board where anyone can spin up a shared URL, add ideas in customisable sections, vote, and export to PDF or Excel. The site is still online and the app still works, but the product appears to be in maintenance mode at best — Terms were last updated in April 2020 and there is no blog, changelog or roadmap to suggest active development.

Full review →
Ludi logo

Ludi

5.7

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →

Summary

IdeaBoardz scores 2.9 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

Ludi scores 5.7 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually.

IdeaBoardz leads on value. Ludi leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Ludi edges ahead with an overall score of 5.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit2.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
Ludi
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade3.5
DetailIdeaBoardzLudi
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limitFully free, no paid tier30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires
Starting priceFree$4/user/mo billed annually
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)$96/mo billed annually
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded20122020
HQPune, IndiaUK
Data residencyEuropean Union
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features733
Integrations01

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityIdeaBoardzLudi
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free, no paywall, no paid tier
  • + No signup required to participate — just share a URL
  • + 1-10 customisable sections cover most retro formats (Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls, etc.)
  • + PDF and Excel export built in
  • + Voting and async input out of the box

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • UI is unchanged from the early 2010s and shows it
  • No timer, no facilitation phases, no drag-and-drop grouping
  • Zero integrations with the agile stack (Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, etc.)
  • Only a few starter board presets; no real template library, no health checks, no AI features
  • Boards are public-by-URL with no SSO, SOC 2, or stated privacy controls
  • Apparently in maintenance mode — Terms last updated April 2020, no changelog or blog

Ludi — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Ludi)

Ludi — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised
← All comparisons