Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.4

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a limited free plan and flat per-team paid pricing.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.0

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a genuinely free tier, a scheduler that auto-creates recurring boards, and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, customizable health checks and an action tracker. SSO, 2FA and audit logs start on the $10/team Pro plan rather than an enterprise tier. ISO 27001 is claimed at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 6.0 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks, SSO from the $10/team tier and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use and fun factor. Reetro leads on value, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights3.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailGoRetroReetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeAnySmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFree plan: 1 team, 5 public boards, 2 team boards per 31-day cycle, unlimited users and guests, 20+ templates. Excludes exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls and icebreakers.3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards per team, 4 columns, 50 guests, 1 health check/month
Starting price$29/team/mo$10/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202019
HQIsraelCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · ImageCSV · Word · Email · Jira · Confluence
Features3541
Integrations26

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityGoRetroReetro
Features
AI Summariesnotenote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Pollingnotenote
Action dashboardnote
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent votingnote
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

GoRetro — pros

  • + Flat per-team pricing ($29/team/mo) with unlimited members per team, plus a free plan for one team
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with per-board anonymity toggles (hide author, hide cards, hide votes)
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — cons

  • <strong>No published product updates since 2023</strong> — changelog last moved 23 May 2023, blog 28 Jul 2023
  • Free plan is thin: exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls and icebreakers are all Premium-gated
  • Integration breadth is narrow — Jira and Slack only, with no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and a meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No public API or webhooks; async is a multi-day feedback deadline, not a structured async flow, and there is no scheduling or recurring retros

Reetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free tier, no credit card — 3 teams, 9 members and 50 guests covers a 24-person org
  • + <strong>SSO (Google, OneLogin, Azure AD, Okta), 2FA and audit logs start on the $10/team Pro plan</strong>, not an enterprise tier
  • + Scheduler auto-creates the next retro board weekly or every 2–4 weeks with layout and settings pre-applied
  • + AI meeting summaries, sentiment analysis and automatic card grouping on paid, alongside customizable health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + Trust center is actively maintained — policy pack, sub-processor list and an AI governance portal all published or refreshed in 2026

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 active boards and 4 columns, with both anonymity and multi-voting paid-only
  • Pro Unlimited's own marketing is self-contradictory — the FAQ and plan table call it flat org-wide $49/mo while the plan card badge says PER TEAM with a 180-member cap
  • Team, comparative and monthly reporting are ticked on the paid columns yet tagged <em>coming soon</em> in the same table — verify the reporting story before you buy
  • On-premises is sold as a Pro Unlimited feature but the tooltip on that plan card says 'coming soon'
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (their trust center lists SOC 2 as 'compliant', not certified) and no SCIM
  • No public API, webhooks or MCP server; no GitHub/Linear; help-doc footers still read 2020–2021 and there's no public changelog

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.