Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs IdeaBoardz

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.8

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a generous free tier and per-team paid plans.

Full review →
IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

2.9

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board where anyone can spin up a shared URL, add ideas in customisable sections, vote, and export to PDF or Excel. The site is still online and the app still works, but the product appears to be in maintenance mode at best — Terms were last updated in April 2020 and there is no blog, changelog or roadmap to suggest active development.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers paid plans from $29/team/mo.

IdeaBoardz scores 2.9 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. IdeaBoardz leads on value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value6.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights3.0
Integrations4.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit2.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailGoRetroIdeaBoardz
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeAnySmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limit30-day free trial of all paid features, no credit card requiredFully free, no paid tier
Starting price$29/team/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually)Free (no paid tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded20202012
HQIsraelPune, India
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features357
Integrations20

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityGoRetroIdeaBoardz
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

GoRetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with unlimited public boards and team members
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with strong template library
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — cons

  • Slack integration sits behind paid tiers; SAML SSO requires Organization tier
  • Integration breadth is narrow: no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • Async is just a multi-day feedback deadline, not a structured async flow; no whiteboard, no scheduling/recurring retros
  • Per-team pricing scales unevenly across many squads, and cross-team rollups are thin

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free, no paywall, no paid tier
  • + No signup required to participate — just share a URL
  • + 1-10 customisable sections cover most retro formats (Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls, etc.)
  • + PDF and Excel export built in
  • + Voting and async input out of the box

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • UI is unchanged from the early 2010s and shows it
  • No timer, no facilitation phases, no drag-and-drop grouping
  • Zero integrations with the agile stack (Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, etc.)
  • Only a few starter board presets; no real template library, no health checks, no AI features
  • Boards are public-by-URL with no SSO, SOC 2, or stated privacy controls
  • Apparently in maintenance mode — Terms last updated April 2020, no changelog or blog
← All comparisons