Retrospective Tools

ScatterSpoke vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

5.6

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke was rebuilt from scratch as v3 in August 2026: guided retro boards, static surveys and AI-run interview surveys, and Ask, which answers questions across closed retros and surveys with cited evidence. An official OAuth MCP server is included on every tier, including Free.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

5.8

Jira-native retros with real sprint data

SprintRetro is an Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity and predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time, second-by-second burndown) into the retro board itself. A major June 2026 release widened it into a continuous-improvement workspace: an infinite whiteboard with visual templates, anonymous team-health pulse checks with cross-sprint trends, an on-demand AI facilitator, and an action dashboard that quality-scores every action. Both Marketplace listings are Cloud Fortified. The free app still covers unlimited users, but a paid Pro app now carries custom templates, unlimited grouping and AI sprint summaries.

Full review →

Summary

ScatterSpoke scores 5.6 overall and is best for engineering orgs that want AI to synthesise feedback across many teams and surveys — and agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want retros, a whiteboard and real sprint metrics on one board — and are happy for everything to stay inside Jira's walls. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, AI & insights, open platform and enterprise-grade. SprintRetro leads on value, fun factor and integrations.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, SprintRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value6.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations1.0
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade6.0
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor7.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailScatterSpokeSprintRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 seat and 1 team; unlimited static surveys and responses; retro boards with manual grouping and voting but no AI; 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask queries one-time; MCP connection but no reading results over itUnlimited users on a Jira site, but capped: 3 basic templates, no custom template creation, limited polls and card grouping, no AI sprint summary. Vendor has published planned caps of ~3–5 sessions/month and under 8 participants per session.
Starting price$29/user/mo$8.40/user/yr billed annually ($0.84/user/mo billed monthly) — SprintRetro Pro; free on Jira sites of 10 or fewer users
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$149/mo on Business (monthly list price) — 3 teams exceed Pro's 2-team cap; the 5 included seats cover the facilitators, since participants and guests never take a seat$17.50/mo (Pro, $210/yr at the 25-user Jira tier; $20.16/mo billed monthly) — the free app also still covers 24 users
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2019—
HQUSAWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSVImage · PDF · Jira
Features4038
Integrations01

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityScatterSpokeSprintRetro
Features
Custom templates✓note✓note
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓note✓note
Action tracking—✓
Async mode✓—
Whiteboard—✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓note✓
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos—✓
AI grouping/clustering✓note✓
AI action items—✓
AI Summaries✓note✓note
Team Insights✓✓note
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard—✓note
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira—✓
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack——
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓note—
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note—
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API✓note—
Webhooks——
MCP server✓—

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier including Free — OAuth sign-in, 33 tools spanning surveys and retro boards; reading results is where the paid line sits
  • + Only facilitators need seats — team members and email-verified guests join boards free, so 3 teams of 8 fit Business's $149/mo base
  • + Private-until-reveal writing and blind voting are on by default, and Group with AI leaves hand-made groups alone
  • + Ask cites the retro or survey behind its answers, and closed-retro summaries track which themes repeat across runs (paid plans)
  • + AI-run interview surveys follow up on each answer — a real option for async health checks between retros

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • − <strong>No action items</strong> — the v3 board has no action object, so decisions go into card comments
  • − No integrations in v3: nothing pushes to Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps or posts to Slack or Teams, whatever the homepage badges say
  • − One CSV export from a closed retro; audit logs are Enterprise-only
  • − Retro AI is paid and Ask is metered — a shared monthly pool of 250 queries on Pro, 2,000 on Business
  • − The docs describe Signals and Automations pages that the shipped web app doesn't include as of October 2026

SprintRetro — pros

  • + <strong>Real Jira sprint data inside the retro</strong> — velocity and predictability over five sprints, scope change, carryover tagged with how many sprints an issue has slipped, cycle time per status, and a burndown that records every individual point change
  • + The action loop is the best part: actions link back to the idea that triggered them, carry forward with duplicate protection, get an AI SMART quality score with a one-tap rewrite, and can be pushed into Jira as issues
  • + June 2026 added a genuine infinite whiteboard — stickies, shapes, frames, tables, connectors, live cursors, follow-a-teammate, Tenor GIFs, private mode, a synced board timer, PNG/print-PDF export, and <em>board import from Miro or Mural</em>
  • + Anonymous Team Health pulses across seven dimensions, with cross-sprint trends overlaid against committed-vs-delivered and carryover — the health-vs-delivery view is rare at this price
  • + <strong>Cloud Fortified</strong> and Bugcrowd bug-bounty on both listings, and the free app still covers unlimited users on a Jira site

SprintRetro — cons

  • − Jira Cloud only — every participant needs a Jira licence, and there is no Slack, Teams, Confluence or standalone web app, nor any public API, webhooks or MCP server
  • − <em>The free tier is narrowing.</em> Today: 3 basic templates, no custom template creation, limited polls and grouping, no AI sprint summary. Published as planned: ~3–5 sessions/month and under 8 participants per session
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own — the trust centre's own entries attribute both to AWS, Atlassian Cloud and Render, not to an Agile Pulse audit. No SCIM, audit logs or data residency, and the app is not "Runs on Atlassian" certified
  • − No async mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no cross-team or org-level health rollup — the Pro usage report covers adoption, not outcomes
  • − Export is whiteboard-only (PNG or print-to-PDF); column-mode retros still have no board export beyond pushing an action into Jira

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.