Retrospective Tools

Metro Retro vs QRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.0

Rebranded twice — Metro Retro became Ludi, now Spreo; the playful retro whiteboard lives on

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. The product has since been renamed twice by its maker, Deqo Software Limited: to Ludi on 4 August 2025, then to Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a trademark cease-and-desist. The metroretro.io domain now 301-redirects straight to spreo.io. If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Spreo; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →
QRetro logo

QRetro

6.3

Manage team health, not sticky notes

QRetro is a completely free retrospective tool with no seat or team caps, built by solo developer Roman Ermilov and shipping since January 2023. It runs a fixed seven-stage session — optional health check, optional icebreaker game, cards, grouping, voting, discussion, results — and closes with an OpenAI-generated summary, a ROTI score, suggested next steps and an analysis layer that clusters the cards by topic, sentiment and urgency. An official hosted MCP server exposes 29 read/write tools so Claude, Cursor or VS Code can query boards, health trends and actions directly.

Full review →

Summary

Metro Retro scores 3.0 overall and is best for searchers who remember Metro Retro and need to know where it went — the product now ships as <strong>Spreo</strong>. Go there, or to a dedicated retro platform, instead. It offers custom pricing.

QRetro scores 6.3 overall and is best for small agile teams and independent squads that want a genuinely well-equipped retro — 52 templates, health checks, ROTI, timer, in-board surveys, icebreaker games and MCP access — at zero cost, and can accept a solo-maintainer vendor with no SSO, no PDF or spreadsheet export and no certifications. It offers a free tier.

QRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, QRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Metro Retro
Ease of Use5.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
QRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights7.5
Integrations5.0
Open Platform4.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailMetro RetroQRetro
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitEverything is free with no seat or team caps — 52 templates, unlimited public and team boards, planning poker, team games, health checks, ROTI, summaries and MCP access
Starting priceFreeFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleN/A — brand retired; see the Spreo listingFree (no paid tier)
EnterpriseNoNo
Founded—2023
HQUnited Kingdom—
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraMarkdown · Email · JSON
Features839
Integrations03

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMetro RetroQRetro
Features
Custom templates—✓note
Anonymous input—✓note
Health Checks—✓note
Action tracking—✓
Async mode——
Whiteboard✓—
Independent voting✓✓
Polling—✓note
Icebreaker games—✓note
Agile Estimations—✓note
Team Kudos—✓note
AI grouping/clustering—✓note
AI action items—✓note
AI Summaries—✓
Team Insights—✓note
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard—✓note
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira—✓note
Linear—✓note
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack—✓note
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR—✓note
SSO / SAML——
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API——
Webhooks——
MCP server—✓

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it now ships as Spreo (Metro Retro → Ludi, 4 Aug 2025 → Spreo, 1 Jul 2026)
  • + The vendor says accounts, boards, data and workflows carried through both renames, and old links redirect
  • + Carried its playful templates, session timer and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • − The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired — the domain 301-redirects straight to spreo.io
  • − Two name changes in under a year (Metro Retro → Ludi → Spreo) leave stranded searchers chasing a moving target; bookmarks, runbooks and SSO configs all need updating
  • − No standalone free tier under the new brand — a 30-day trial, then paid

QRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no seat caps, team caps or paywalled features — a 24-person org across three teams pays nothing, and there is no paid tier to be upsold to
  • + Retro toolkit is deep for a free product: 52 templates, editable columns, cards hidden from everyone else until grouping, a timer, drag-and-drop grouping, presentation mode, up to five in-board surveys, action items with owners and priorities, ROTI and a radar-charted health check that trends across retros
  • + The analysis layer is the surprise — every card gets a system-assigned sentiment, category and urgency score, and the <strong>Perception Mirror</strong> compares the system's own topic clusters against the groups the team made and names the ones that quietly hold three different problems
  • + Unusually strong engagement layer for a product that charges nothing — four built-in games (Draw &amp; Guess, Sprint in one GIF, Hangman, Decoded) usable as a switchable icebreaker stage, plus GIF cards, emoji reactions and live cursors. TeleRetro and the whiteboard tools still go further, mainly on music and ambient audio
  • + Official hosted MCP server with 29 read, write and delete tools, two analysis prompts and OAuth sign-in, listed in the official MCP Registry as com.qretro/retro, though as of October 2026 its documented address (mcp.qretro.com) returns an error

QRetro — cons

  • − Built and maintained by a single developer (Roman Ermilov) with no support team, SLA or published company entity — the enterprise-grade cap for founder-only vendors applies regardless of how good the product is
  • − No enterprise controls: no SSO or SAML, no SCIM, no audit logs, no SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and no published hosting location or data-residency option
  • − The data stays inside the product: export is a Markdown copy of the summary, an email, a Slack or Telegram recap and a JSON dump of your own account, with no PDF, CSV or Excel. There is no cross-team reporting either; the dashboard's Analytics section is still labelled <em>Coming soon</em>
  • − Integration set is narrow: Jira, Linear, Slack and Telegram only — nothing for Teams, Confluence, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps or any other tracker
  • − Built for a live session: no async mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, a fixed stage order, a 30-minute timer cap and an automatic vote allowance (cards + 3, capped at 10). Once cards are grouped, only the group can be voted on

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.