Retrospective Tools

Ludi vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Ludi logo

Ludi

5.7

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.8

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint with a /retro command, then runs the retro on a synced web board with voting, action items and an optional CarrotIQ AI assistant. <em>Public update cadence appears slow — verify the product is still actively maintained before committing.</em>

Full review →

Summary

Ludi scores 5.7 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually.

Retro Rabbit scores 4.8 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/mo.

Ludi leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. Retro Rabbit leads on AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Ludi edges ahead with an overall score of 5.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Ludi
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade3.5
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.5
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations2.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailLudiRetro Rabbit
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoNo
Free limit30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$4/user/mo billed annually$30/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$96/mo billed annually$90/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2020
HQUKUnited States
Data residencyEuropean Union
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features3317
Integrations11

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityLudiRetro Rabbit
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnotenote
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2notenote
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Ludi — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Ludi)

Ludi — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — capture notes via /retro during the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously, not in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag/drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ AI handles grouping, action items and summaries on the Pro AI plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing scales cleanly for small squads

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no documented GDPR posture
  • Per-team flat pricing — 3 teams of 8 lands at $90/mo on the Starter tier
← All comparisons