Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.4

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, the Lucid AI conversational assistant (prompt-to-board, clustering, summaries), and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701, FedRAMP, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.4

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.4 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 6.4 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark leads on fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. Reetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and value.

Lucidspark and Reetro are evenly matched overall. The right choice comes down to which dimensions matter most to your team.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor5.5
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailLucidsparkReetro
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price$7.95/user/mo$39/team/mo ($32/team/mo annual); flat $49/mo org-wide on Pro Unlimited
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$216/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $9/user)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20102019
HQSouth Jordan, USCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia
Languages10 (English, Spanish, German, …)English only
Features3641
Integrations77

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityLucidsparkReetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUpnote
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701, FedRAMP, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI is general brainstorming/clustering, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Business tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Per-team Pro pricing rose to $39/team/mo ($32 annual); the cheapest path for scale is the flat Pro Unlimited
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons