Retrospective Tools

ScatterSpoke vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

5.6

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke was rebuilt from scratch as v3 in August 2026: guided retro boards, static surveys and AI-run interview surveys, and Ask, which answers questions across closed retros and surveys with cited evidence. An official OAuth MCP server is included on every tier, including Free.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

5.8

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, AI icebreaker questions, background music and a clean facilitation flow. Participants join by link with no account. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, and prices per team rather than per user, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

ScatterSpoke scores 5.6 overall and is best for engineering orgs that want AI to synthesise feedback across many teams and surveys — and agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke leads on AI & insights, open platform and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, value, fun factor and integrations.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value6.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations1.0
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade6.0
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights1.5
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.5
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailScatterSpokeTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 seat and 1 team; unlimited static surveys and responses; retro boards with manual grouping and voting but no AI; 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask queries one-time; MCP connection but no reading results over it1 team, 3 retros total (deleted retros still count), 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access, 10 AI icebreaker questions
Starting price$29/user/mo£26/mo (Team plan, 1 team, unlimited members; £21/mo billed annually)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$149/mo on Business (monthly list price) — 3 teams exceed Pro's 2-team cap; the 5 included seats cover the facilitators, since participants and guests never take a seat£72/mo (~$96/mo) on the Business plan — 3 teams, unlimited members; £58/mo billed annually
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20192020
HQUSAUK
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish only1 (English)
Export formatsCSVEmail · Image · JSON
Features4039
Integrations010

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityScatterSpokeTeleRetro
Features
Custom templates✓note✓note
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks✓note✓note
Action tracking—✓note
Async mode✓✓note
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓note—
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓note—
AI action items——
AI Summaries✓note—
Team Insights✓—
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard—✓
Integrations
Asana—✓note
Azure DevOps—✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence—✓note
GitHub—✓note
GitLab——
Jira—✓note
Linear——
Microsoft Teams—✓note
Monday.com—✓note
Notion—✓note
Shortcut——
Slack—✓
Trello—✓note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓note—
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note—
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API✓note✓note
Webhooks——
MCP server✓—

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier including Free — OAuth sign-in, 33 tools spanning surveys and retro boards; reading results is where the paid line sits
  • + Only facilitators need seats — team members and email-verified guests join boards free, so 3 teams of 8 fit Business's $149/mo base
  • + Private-until-reveal writing and blind voting are on by default, and Group with AI leaves hand-made groups alone
  • + Ask cites the retro or survey behind its answers, and closed-retro summaries track which themes repeat across runs (paid plans)
  • + AI-run interview surveys follow up on each answer — a real option for async health checks between retros

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • − <strong>No action items</strong> — the v3 board has no action object, so decisions go into card comments
  • − No integrations in v3: nothing pushes to Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps or posts to Slack or Teams, whatever the homepage badges say
  • − One CSV export from a closed retro; audit logs are Enterprise-only
  • − Retro AI is paid and Ask is metered — a shared monthly pool of 250 queries on Pro, 2,000 on Business
  • − The docs describe Signals and Automations pages that the shipped web app doesn't include as of October 2026

TeleRetro — pros

  • + A rich <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong>: GIFs that float across the board, emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, Spotlight to focus the room on one note, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros — 16 fully anonymous templates, custom models, and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Flat per-team pricing with <em>no per-user charge</em> — £72/mo covers 3 teams, unlimited members and unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • − Slack is the only native integration; the in-app integrations panel offers Slack and Zapier and nothing else, despite Jira appearing on the vendor's comparison pages
  • − No way to schedule a future retro or set one to recur, and actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em> — nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it either
  • − AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • − Export is thin: an emailed summary, a PNG of the summary screen, and an org-metrics JSON dump. No CSV, PDF or Excel
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.