Retrospective Tools

RetroTeam vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

5.3

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

3.9

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTeam scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 3.9 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

RetroTeam leads on ease of use, value, fun factor and AI & insights. Trune.io leads on integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, RetroTeam edges ahead with an overall score of 5.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTeam
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights6.5
Integrations2.5
Enterprise-grade1.5
Trune.io
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailRetroTeamTrune.io
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price$10/mo$19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$30/mo$57/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2022
HQVienna, Austria
Data residencyGermany
LanguagesEnglish only2 (English, German)
Features1817
Integrations19

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroTeamTrune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through late March 2026
  • + Custom template builder for teams that outgrow the four presets

RetroTeam — cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates (custom builder fills the gap, but no template library)

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Integrations (Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack, Teams, Trello) run through Zapier, not native; integrations also require the higher Professional tier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons