Retrospective Tools

RetroTeam vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

4.7

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

6.3

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and surveys into themes, sentiment and prioritised action items — and, since ScatterSpoke 3.0, exposes the whole survey lifecycle to AI agents over an official MCP server.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTeam scores 4.7 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke scores 6.3 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI synthesis across many retros — or agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

RetroTeam leads on ease of use and value. ScatterSpoke leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 6.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTeam
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights6.5
Integrations2.5
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade1.5
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights9.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform8.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailRetroTeamScatterSpoke
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits1 seat, unlimited static surveys and responses, 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask credits (one-time), basic signal detection, MCP access, social logins
Starting price$10/mo$29/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$30/mo (Pro — 5 teams, 50 users; Premium's 2-team / 20-user cap doesn't fit 3 teams of 8)$814/mo on Business (includes 5 seats; 19 extra seats at $35/seat/mo)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20222019
HQOakland, California, USUSA
Data residencyUnited States
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDFPDF · CSV · Email · Jira · Confluence
Features2038
Integrations14

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroTeamScatterSpoke
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPRnote
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooksnote
MCP server

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow — capture, AI group, vote, act — with a timer on every stage
  • + AI grouping suggestions are accept/reject per card, not applied over your head
  • + Flat plan pricing: $30/mo covers 5 teams and 50 users, well under per-seat rivals
  • + Participants join by link with no account required
  • + Org-wide action dashboard with owner, status and due date, plus one-way Jira links

RetroTeam — cons

  • Jira is the only integration — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps, and no public API or webhooks
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Four built-in templates only; the custom builder fills the gap, but there's no template library
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 or audit logs, and hosting is US-only with no EU residency option
  • AI is credit-metered — 50/mo on Premium, 150 on Pro, then an upgrade or a one-off credit top-up

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier, including Free — agents can create, distribute and query surveys
  • + AI theme extraction, issue detection, sentiment over time and adaptive AI-moderated interviews
  • + SOC 2 Type II since launch, with annual penetration testing
  • + 20+ retro formats, guided phases, and cross-team/program rollups

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • $814/mo for 3 teams of 8 on Business — 5 seats included, then $35/seat
  • Free tier is a single seat, so it can no longer run a team retro
  • No dedicated health-check model, team radars or psychological-safety survey
  • Integrations stop at Jira, Slack and Teams — no GitHub, Azure DevOps or Linear
  • The 3.0 pricing tiers never mention retrospectives; help-centre release notes stop at Sept 2024

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.