Retrospective Tools

Retro Rabbit vs RetroTeam

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.8

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint with a /retro command, then runs the retro on a synced web board with voting, action items and an optional CarrotIQ AI assistant. <em>Public update cadence appears slow — verify the product is still actively maintained before committing.</em>

Full review →
RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

5.3

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →

Summary

Retro Rabbit scores 4.8 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/mo.

RetroTeam scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Retro Rabbit leads on enterprise-grade. RetroTeam leads on ease of use, value, fun factor and AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, RetroTeam edges ahead with an overall score of 5.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.5
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations2.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
RetroTeam
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights6.5
Integrations2.5
Enterprise-grade1.5
DetailRetro RabbitRetroTeam
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limit14-day free trial, no credit card required1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits
Starting price$30/mo$10/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$90/mo$30/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2022
HQUnited States
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features1718
Integrations11

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetro RabbitRetroTeam
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — capture notes via /retro during the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously, not in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag/drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ AI handles grouping, action items and summaries on the Pro AI plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing scales cleanly for small squads

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no documented GDPR posture
  • Per-team flat pricing — 3 teams of 8 lands at $90/mo on the Starter tier

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through late March 2026
  • + Custom template builder for teams that outgrow the four presets

RetroTeam — cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates (custom builder fills the gap, but no template library)
← All comparisons