Retrospective Tools

RetroFlow vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.7

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 7 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

3.9

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

RetroFlow scores 3.7 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there are no integrations, AI or enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 3.9 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

RetroFlow leads on ease of use, value and fun factor. Trune.io leads on retro toolkit, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Trune.io edges ahead with an overall score of 3.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit3.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
Trune.io
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailRetroFlowTrune.io
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitEverything is free — all 7 templates, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items, with no account required to join a board5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting priceFree$19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)$57/mo
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded
HQVienna, Austria
Data residencyGermany
LanguagesEnglish only2 (English, German)
Features717
Integrations09

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroFlowTrune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join with one click
  • + Seven ready-made retrospective formats covering the common reflection patterns
  • + Real-time collaboration with live notes, dot voting and shared action items
  • + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, 7 colour palettes and 48 emojis

RetroFlow — cons

  • No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
  • No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction or sentiment)
  • No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs; the privacy policy confirms only HTTPS and Vercel hosting with Google Analytics/PostHog analytics
  • Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — fine for ad-hoc use, but unsuitable for enterprise procurement
  • Boards are private only by unguessable URL — there are no accounts, so no real access control, invite management or board history

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Integrations (Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack, Teams, Trello) run through Zapier, not native; integrations also require the higher Professional tier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons