Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.8

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs a time-boxed retro through Icebreaker, Ideate, Group, Vote, Discuss and Feedback stages, ending in a 5-Why root cause drill-down on whatever the team voted up. Action items created in the Discuss stage convert directly into Nimble work items (user stories, cards) in the project the retro was created from. There is no separate purchase — Retrospectives ship to every Public SaaS Nimble account by default.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

5.8

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, AI icebreaker questions, background music and a clean facilitation flow. Participants join by link with no account. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, and prices per team rather than per user, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 3.8 overall and is best for small agile teams already inside the Nimble suite that want a structured, time-boxed retro ending in a real root cause analysis, with the follow-up landing in the same backlog they already work from. It offers paid plans from $15/mo (up to 20 users).

TeleRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

NimbleRetro leads on open platform and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights and integrations.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use5.5
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform5.0
Enterprise-grade5.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights1.5
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.5
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailNimbleRetroTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitFree trial only; no permanent free tier published for the retro module. The suite pricing page's only $0 plan (10 users / 10 projects) sits in a tier table hidden on every device, and Retrospectives appear in neither the live tier table nor the suite's full feature-comparison table1 team, 3 retros total (deleted retros still count), 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access, 10 AI icebreaker questions
Starting price$15/mo (up to 20 users)£26/mo (Team plan, 1 team, unlimited members; £21/mo billed annually)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo (24 users x $10/user/mo Nimble Team tier); NimbleRetro's own $15/mo plan caps at 20 users and no larger standalone tier is published£72/mo (~$96/mo) on the Business plan — 3 teams, unlimited members; £58/mo billed annually
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20022020
HQCupertino, CA, United StatesUK
Data residencyUnited States—
LanguagesEnglish only1 (English)
Export formats—Email · Image · JSON
Features2139
Integrations410

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNimbleRetroTeleRetro
Features
Custom templates✓✓note
Anonymous input✓✓
Health Checks—✓note
Action tracking✓✓note
Async mode—✓note
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓note✓
Polling✓note—
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering——
AI action items——
AI Summaries——
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓note✓
Integrations
Asana—✓note
Azure DevOps—✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence—✓note
GitHub✓note✓note
GitLab✓note—
Jira—✓note
Linear——
Microsoft Teams✓note✓note
Monday.com—✓note
Notion—✓note
Shortcut——
Slack✓note✓
Trello—✓note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓note—
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001✓note—
On-premises——
Public API✓note✓note
Webhooks✓note—
MCP server✓note—

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + 5-Why root cause analysis is a <em>built-in retro stage</em>, not an afterthought — almost no other retro tool ships one
  • + Anonymous voting plus a facilitator-set timer on every stage keeps a 60-minute retro on the rails
  • + Action items convert directly into Nimble work items, so follow-up lands in the same backlog the team already works from
  • + Included by default in every Public SaaS Nimble account — no separate purchase, no tier upgrade, available to all user roles
  • + NimbleWork, Inc. holds its own SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 attestations, with reports on request through its trust center, and supports SAMLv2/ADFSv3 SSO

NimbleRetro — cons

  • − The dedicated NimbleRetro iOS and Android apps have been delisted from both the App Store and Google Play, while the product pages still advertise them
  • − No health checks, no recurring retros, no async mode, and no documented export of a retro board in any format
  • − The platform surface — REST API, outgoing webhooks and the new Nimble MCP server — reaches Nimble cards only; none of it touches a retro, and no AI runs on retro data despite the Retrium comparison page ticking <em>Generative AI</em>
  • − Participants are limited to members of the Nimble project the retro was created from, and the module is unavailable outside Public SaaS
  • − No rate card: the only NimbleRetro-specific price NimbleWork publishes ($15/mo for up to 20 users) sits on a blog post, and the retro 'pricing' page is a product page with a demo form

TeleRetro — pros

  • + A rich <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong>: GIFs that float across the board, emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, Spotlight to focus the room on one note, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros — 16 fully anonymous templates, custom models, and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Flat per-team pricing with <em>no per-user charge</em> — £72/mo covers 3 teams, unlimited members and unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • − Slack is the only native integration; the in-app integrations panel offers Slack and Zapier and nothing else, despite Jira appearing on the vendor's comparison pages
  • − No way to schedule a future retro or set one to recur, and actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em> — nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it either
  • − AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • − Export is thin: an emailed summary, a PNG of the summary screen, and an org-metrics JSON dump. No CSV, PDF or Excel
  • − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.