Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.6

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs structured, time-bound retros through Icebreaker, Ideation, Grouping, Voting, and Root Cause Analysis stages, with anonymous input, action item tracking, and a 5-Why root cause workflow. Native iOS and Android apps complement the web product, and action items convert directly into Nimble workitems (user stories and cards).

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.1

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, icebreaker games, background music and a clean facilitation flow. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 3.6 overall and is best for small agile teams that want a no-frills retro with built-in root cause analysis and a mobile companion app, especially teams already using the wider NimbleWork (SwiftKanban / Nimble) suite. It offers paid plans from $10/user/mo (Nimble Team tier, USD; standalone NimbleRetro is quote-only).

TeleRetro scores 6.1 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

NimbleRetro leads on enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights and integrations.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade5.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailNimbleRetroTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitFree trial only; no permanent free tier published for the retro module. A $0 Nimble suite plan (10 users / 10 projects) appears in a secondary table on the suite pricing page, but it does not list Retrospectives among its features1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting price$10/user/mo (Nimble Team tier, USD; standalone NimbleRetro is quote-only)£26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo (24 users x $10/user/mo Nimble Team tier); standalone NimbleRetro is quote-only£72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20022020
HQCupertino, CA, United StatesUK
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish only14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsEmail · Jira
Features1635
Integrations27

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNimbleRetroTeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnotenote
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooksnote
MCP server

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + Structured 5-Why root cause workflow built into the retro flow
  • + Anonymous input and time-bound stages keep retros focused
  • + Native iOS and Android apps for mobile participation
  • + NimbleWork runs an annual SOC 2 Type II audit and an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 audit, with SAMLv2/ADFSv3 SSO at the platform level
  • + Action items convert directly into Nimble work items, so follow-up lands in the same backlog the team already works from

NimbleRetro — cons

  • Only four templates, and custom templates cap out at four columns
  • No SCIM provisioning or audit logs documented; SSO and the SOC 2 / ISO 27001 attestations sit at the NimbleWork platform level, not the retro module
  • Comparison pages tick 'Generative AI' for NimbleRetro, but no retro AI (clustering, summaries, sentiment) is documented — NimbleWork's AI Agents are a separately licensed add-on aimed at Nimble cards and analytics
  • No documented export of a retro board in any format
  • Thin direct-integration story for the agile stack — no documented Jira, GitHub, Linear, or Azure DevOps hooks for the retro module
  • Participants are limited to members of the Nimble project the retro is created from
  • NimbleRetro's own pricing page is demo-gated; the only published rate card is the Nimble suite's ($10/user/mo Team, $26/user/mo Business)

TeleRetro — pros

  • + The deepest <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong> of any tool here — GIF and emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros, with 20+ ready templates and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Genuinely cheap for a small org — £72/mo covers 3 teams with unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • Only Slack is documented as a native integration; Jira is claimed on the vendor's comparison pages but absent from its own integrations page, and everything else routes through Zapier
  • Actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em>, and nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it
  • AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only
  • No product update shipped since August 2025 — the marketing site is actively maintained, the changelog is not

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.